"Bottleneck Population Theory" - Extinction Protocol

It's puzzling that most human beings keep dormant their survival instinct. when faced with an existential threat. Future witnesses to a past genocide assess the death and destruction and say never again, yet they do little to associate themselves with those past circumstances in their current circumstance.

In Canada, we have come to recognize the condemnable manner in which Native Canadians achieved emancipation (i.e. through subjugation and genocide) yet we fail to see these same villainous beacons in our own lifetime. The hypocrisy is that we seek justice for the Native Canadian at a time when all of humankind faces an existential threat. It makes no sense, and it is shear madness.

The "bottleneck population theory" refers to the ability of a species to suddenly evolve into a better species when facing extinction. Does the following appear familiar when considering what is happening in the world today?

A population bottleneck or genetic bottleneck is a sharp reduction in the size of a population due to environmental events such as famines, earthquakes, floods, fires, disease, and droughts or human activities such as speci-cide, widespread violence or intentional culling, and human population planning.

Such events can reduce the variation in the gene-pool of a population; thereafter, a smaller population, with a smaller genetic diversity, remains to pass on genes to future generations of offspring through sexual reproduction (or scientifically controlled non-biological reproduction processes).  Genetic diversity remains lower, increasing only when gene flow from another population occurs or very slowly increasing with time as random mutations occur. This results in a reduction in the robustness of the population and in its ability to adapt to and survive selecting environmental changes, such as climate change or a shift in available resources. Alternatively, if survivors of the bottleneck are the individuals with the greatest genetic fitness, the frequency of the fitter genes within the gene pool is increased, while the pool itself is reduced.

Are all "humans" the architects of this new evolutionary cycle or are a few amongst us assuming the role of creation engineers. Have the few self-enthroned themselves as the better species which will carry forward Humankind into the age of Trans-humanism? It certainly appears that way, yet in reality they should all be classified as "madmen".

The word engineer derives from the Sumerian god named Enki. I will once again refer you to Zecariah Sitchin's "The Lost Book of Enki" so that you may read the outcome of prohibited human engineering - as translated from the Sumerian Tablets.

Thank you,

Joseph Pede