Mssrs. Harper, Flaherty and
Carney - RE: Bail/CDIC
I had emailed you some time ago with
respect to CDIC insurance, but have yet to receive a response. My unanswered
concerns are shown again below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. I contest Mr. Carney’s remarks that banks have substantial capital. Banks must not be “too big to fail” and they serve no critical function in our economy.
Is it not time we expose the
banking system for what it is – a corrupt, fraudulent PONZI scheme. Hard
working people have not created toxic assets or schemed to deplete people of
their hard earned money. Let’s shut down the banks, and if they fail, the bond
holders and shareholders should be left holding the empty bag, not the Canadian
public.
Depositors falsely entrust their
money to banking community. They are in fact “unsecured” creditors – they
actually “lend” money when they make a deposit. The only hope you have of
recovering your money, in the event of a bank failure, is CDIC (Canadian Deposit
Insurance Corporation) insurance. Your deposits should be insured up to $100,000.00 (in Canada).
The extent to which CDIC would
bail-out depositors in a major financial collapse has yet to be tested. As you
can see from the data below CDIC coverage may be “hot air”. Even if CDIC
borrowed the additional $17 billion from the Federal government, only 3% of the
total depositors would have coverage – or each depositor would receive 3 cents
on the dollar (and we have no more pennies!). Technically, 97% of depositors
would lose their money.
According to the CDIC's 2010 Annual Report, CDIC protects $590 billion CAD
in total eligible deposits, and has $1.95 billion CAD in assets to meet
insurance claims.[4] This amount represents 0.33% of total eligible deposits.
The CDIC is also authorized to borrow up to $17 billion if necessary from the
federal government or the financial markets, and may request further funds from
Parliament.
In these uncertain financial
times we must demand that our government insure at least 100% of the insurable
deposit limit for every applicable depositor (i.e. $100,000.00).
In addition, governments must
provide alternative avenues of “funds management”. My RRSP’s are held by
financial institutions. If I withdraw my funds I would be taxed. Alternatively,
the only way of receiving a tax deduction is to deposit RRSP funds into a bank
or financial institution. This is a catch-22. Investors should be able to
withdraw these funds “tax-free” and provide their own guardianship - in these uncertain
times a mattress would suffice. In the absence of secure depositor financial
protection we must demand free non-taxable access to our funds. If our
government is willing to protect the “criminal banking community” then we must
demand equal justice.
Mr. Harper I want to take my money out the banking system. I want to
withdraw my RRSP funds tax free. What solutions do you have? I don’t trust the
banks and I don’t trust you.
Can you please provide a response
to the concerns I have raised above? Additionally, Mark Carney and Al Flaherty’s
office recently stated the following:
Canadian savers with accounts in the country's six systemically important
banks need not worry, however, he said at an event in Washington hosted by
Thomson Reuters.
"Canadian institutions have substantial unsecured debt obligations in
the wholesale market and as well as other classes of capital, and they have
substantial capital as well, so once you stack all of that up, regardless of
whether one would look to reach into it ... it's hard to fathom why it would be
necessary," the Bank of Canada governor said.
Flaherty’s director of communications Dan Miles repeated the pledge: "The
'bail-in' scenario described in the budget has nothing to do with consumer
deposits and they are not part of the `bail-in' regime. Under a `bail-in'
arrangement, a failing financial institution has to tap into its own special
reserves or assets (which it has been forced to put aside) to keep its
operations going."
Additional questions:
Additional questions:
1.
Are depositor savings
not held by the systemically named banks at risk?
2. I contest Mr. Carney’s remarks that banks have substantial capital. Banks must not be “too big to fail” and they serve no critical function in our economy.
Here is an important final note;
the Canadian national debt is approximately $610 billion or $17,000 for every
man, woman and child in Canada. The already monetized and unreported derivative
loss for the six systemically important banks total $20 trillion, or $555,000
for every Canadian man, woman and child. That’s “32 times higher” than our
nation’s debt. So what substantial
capital do the banks have that could erase this quantity of debt?
Thank you,
Joseph Pede
Joseph Pede
No comments:
Post a Comment