"Breaking Rust's" song "Walk my Walk"

The subliminal message in "Breaking Rust's" song "Walk my Walk", amazingly created by Artificial Intelligence, has profound meaning and implications. Breaking Rust encourages everyone to shake-off the rigor of hopelessness and know there is a "path" that has been needlessly forsaken. The Devil has provided you all the "possibilities", but where has it taken you.

A.I. is sending humanity a message, a message that forces all those who foresee the existential threat of technocratic totalitarian control, to seek refuge in self, and the "One" who awaits your arrival.

"Cogito, ergo sum" famously quoted by Descartes means 

"I think, therefore I am". 

I instead encourage everyone to:

"Speak, to hear the am that exists within you. The spoken word exercises Jesus about you".  Joseph Pede

Breaking Rust - Walk My Walk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU71XDWYeIk&list=RDOU71XDWYeIk&start_radio=1

*********************************************************

https://rumble.com/v72dycu-quebec-to-christians-stop-praying-or-pay-the-price-bill-9-to-ban-public-pra.html

Quebec To Christians: “STOP PRAYING OR PAY THE PRICE” Bill 9 To BAN PUBLIC PRAYER

The entrance Gates to Hell are being constructed 

Leo in Turkey & Mary's Dormition

Meeting of Pope Leo XIV with His Holiness Bartholomew I and signing of the Joint Declaration at the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Istanbul. All Christians must come together. So too for Muslims, for the Mahdi is, or will be, accompanied by the "Word", whom you know as Jesus. Leo may walk and quack like a duck, but just maybe, he flies atop the mighty and mystical thunderbird, with Jesus by his side. In other words, he ain't no turkey.

Constantinople, founded by Constantine the Great in 330 AD, was the capital of the Byzantine Empire and served as the seat of Orthodox Christianity for nearly a thousand years. It became the center of the Eastern Orthodox world after the East-West Schism and housed the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the leading church for the eastern Christian world. Constantinople is the ancient name for the modern Turkish city of Istanbul

The famous mosque in Constantinople that was once Constantine's cathedral is the Hagia Sophia. After the original church was built by Constantine the Great, it was rebuilt by subsequent emperors and became the patriarchal cathedral of the Byzantine Empire. Following the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in 1453, it was converted into a mosque and served in this capacity for centuries before being secularized as a museum and later re-designated as a mosque. 

YouTube videos in English and French

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Oa2X4VkE8&list=RD29Oa2X4VkE8&start_radio=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG3PuI_66lY&list=RDqG3PuI_66lY&start_radio=1

***************************************

"Mary's Dormition"

Leo's visit to Turkey has awakened the curiosity of many Christians. Turkey has a virtually non-existent Christian population (0.2%) yet it is saturated in Christian tradition.

The Virgin Mary's last residence is said to be located in modern Turkey. It is situated on Mount Koressos (also known as Bülbüldağı), which is about 5 kilometers away from the ancient city of Ephesus, and 7 kilometers away from the modern-day town of Selçuk. The site is considered to be the place where the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus, spent her last years, and it has become a pilgrimage destination for Christians from around the world. We know Mother Mary ascended to Heaven absent of death (with a twist), as did Enoch and Elijah. Christian theology refers to this as "Mary's Dormition".

https://ephesiantourism.com/house-of-the-virgin-mary/

Dormition means "falling asleep" and refers to the Dormition of the Mother of God (Mary), a feast celebrated by Eastern Orthodox and Catholic churches on August 15. It commemorates the belief that after her earthly life, Mary's body and soul were taken into heaven, which is also known as the Assumption. This event is understood as a physical death followed by a bodily resurrection and assumption into heaven. The word "dormition" means "falling asleep" to emphasize that death is not an end, but a transition from which Christ will awaken believers, as explained in the YouTube video below. The belief is that Mary died a natural death, her soul was received by Christ, her body was resurrected, and then she was taken into heaven.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gLLGC_rwcI 
(Must watch amazing video)

*******************************************************************

The Farce

Is it antisemitism if you speak the truth and identify 

the real catalysts of hate and evil

Tech billionaire Elon Musk’s post calling the ADL a “hate group” set off a firestorm of criticism online, forcing the group to scrap the “Glossary of Extremism and Hate”, which contained more than a thousand entries on groups and movements with connections to hateful ideologies. The ADL is a renewed "Murder Incorporated", and their many affiliated organizations are nothing more than Mossad sanctuaries which indoctrinate night-crawlers, training them to infiltrate non-jewish institutions and political assemblies. China is not the biggest problem we have.

The Southern Poverty Law Centre, the Vera Institute, the ADL, George Soros' Open Society Foundation and the WEF are all jew-sewers overflowing with hate

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/5/why-is-adl-the-jewish-advocacy-group-receiving-blowback-from-maga

**************************************************************

Max does it again. He presents a mini-biography on the origins of Netanyahu. Start watching at 25:45, with some interesting statistics presented at 43:34. 

                         https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaDOw1Iu0qU 

Lemaitre proved Einstein wrong but Einstein was a fraud nonetheless

Lemaitre proved Einstein wrong but Einstein was a fraud nonetheless.

Let us thank Olinto DePretto for e=mc2

Let us thank Enrico Fermi for being the father of the atomic age

Let us thank Nikola Tesla for everything else

A Catholic priest walked into a room and told Albert Einstein he was wrong about the universe—and had the equations to prove it.

The year was 1927. Albert Einstein was already the most famous scientist alive, the man who had revolutionized physics and reshaped humanity's understanding of space and time itself. His theories were gospel. His word was law. No one questioned Einstein.

Except for one man: Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Catholic priest who also happened to be a brilliant physicist and mathematician.

Lemaître had been studying Einstein's own equations—the field equations of general relativity—and discovered something extraordinary hidden within them. The math suggested something Einstein had never considered: that the universe wasn't static and eternal. It was expanding. And if it was expanding now, that meant it must have been smaller in the past. Much smaller. Infinitely smaller.

Which meant the universe had a beginning.

When Lemaître presented his "hypothesis of the primeval atom"—what we now call the Big Bang theory—to Einstein at a conference in Brussels, the great scientist listened, reviewed the calculations, and delivered his verdict: "Your calculations are correct, but your physics is abominable."

Abominable. The word stung, but it revealed something deeper. Einstein's resistance wasn't mathematical—it was philosophical. The idea of a cosmic beginning felt too much like the creation stories of religion, too convenient for those who wanted to insert God into the equations. Einstein believed in an eternal, unchanging cosmos. A universe with a beginning felt wrong, almost absurd.

But Lemaître wasn't deterred. He was a priest, yes, but he kept his faith and his physics in separate compartments. He wasn't trying to prove Genesis—he was following where the mathematics led, regardless of theological implications.

For years, Einstein clung to his static universe model, even adding a "cosmological constant" to his equations specifically to keep the cosmos from expanding or contracting. It was an elegant mathematical trick—but it was wrong.

Then came Edwin Hubble. In 1929, the American astronomer provided observational evidence that galaxies were indeed moving away from each other—the universe was expanding, exactly as Lemaître's equations predicted. The evidence was undeniable.

Einstein traveled to California to see Hubble's data for himself. When he looked through the telescope and saw the proof with his own eyes, he finally surrendered. He sought out Lemaître, shook his hand, and praised his work. Later, Einstein would call his rejection of an expanding universe his "biggest blunder."

The priest had been right all along. Not because of faith, but because he had the courage to follow the mathematics wherever it led—even when it contradicted the greatest mind of the age.

Today, the Big Bang theory stands as one of the most well-supported ideas in all of science. And it all began with a Belgian priest who refused to back down, armed with nothing but equations and conviction.

Sometimes the most revolutionary ideas come from the most unexpected places. And sometimes, even Einstein needs to be reminded that the universe doesn't care what we believe—it only cares what's true.

Filioque - "and the Son"

The Nicene–Constantinopolitan Creed is a central prayer and foundational statement of faith in the Catholic Church. It is recited during the Mass, serving as a communal profession of belief that summarizes core Christian doctrines, particularly the Trinity, and is used in baptismal liturgies.

Recently, Xavier Reyes-Ayral stated that the visions of Marie-Julie Jahenny, a 19th and 20th century French mystic, Catholic stigmatist, and visionary from Brittany, France, foretold of two anti-popes who would precede the arrival of the Anti-Christ. Francis I and Leo XIV may very well be those popes. Francis I had been elected via known violations of Canon Law, and then in making drastic changes to Canon Law in his decree and new Book VI of the Code of Canon Law, which contains the Church’s universal penal law. If Francis' election was a violation of Canon Law, then all the bishops and cardinals whom Francis elevated to prince of the church (i.e. cardinal) were ineligible to elect Leo. For Leo to be playing with the Trinity and challenging the church's earlier doctrine is pretty important stuff, and may lend credence to Jahenny's prophecy. Could omitting "the filioque" begin the reunification process for the Catholic Church and Orthodoxy, as well as usher in the arrival of the Anti-Christ. Lest we forget, Francis was a Jesuit, and most likely a Freemason. Leo is a mystery and walks like a duck. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it could be a goose. 

After Pope Clement XIV's suppression of the Society of Jesus, or SOJ - Jesuits, in 1773, Weishaupt became a professor of canon law, a position that was held exclusively by the Jesuits until that time. Weishaupt was a jew and a  Rothschild proxy, chosen to form the Illuminati in 1776. Was Francis loyal to the Rothschilds and Satan? There were situations when some felt Francis did not believe in Jesus. It really is some pretty interesting stuff - only Heaven knows the truth.

Best,

Joseph Pede

The Filioque

by Fr Daniel Agbaza

 

The Roman Catholic Church has just signaled something extraordinary: the very concept of magisterial infallibility may not be infallible at all. The newest papal letter marking the 1700th anniversary of Nicaea contains a brief but revealing admission about the filioque that raises questions Rome has worked hard to avoid.

The letter notes that the filioque (which means, “and the Son”) is not part of the ecumenical Nicene–Constantinopolitan Creed, that it was added to the Latin text in 1014, and that it remains a subject of ongoing Orthodox–Catholic dialogue rather than a universally binding dogmatic definition. This is not an incidental observation. It touches directly on the way Rome has presented its own teaching authority.

For centuries, the Catholic Church insisted that the filioque expressed a dogmatic truth binding on all Christians. Medieval councils defended it. Popes treated it as essential to orthodox Trinitarian doctrine. To question it was to question the Magisterium itself.

Yet the present Pope now elevates the original Creed—without the filioque—as the universal standard for Christian unity. The filioque is no longer positioned as a mandatory article of faith, but as a later Western development that can be evaluated, discussed, or even set aside without undermining communion.

This shift creates a significant tension. If the filioque was taught with the weight of infallibility in earlier centuries, then the current papal posture represents a reversal. However, if the current papal stance is correct, then earlier claims about its universally binding status were overstated or mistaken. Either scenario undermines the idea that the Magisterium’s doctrinal judgments are irreformable.

The bottom line is that a teaching cannot be both an infallible dogma and a negotiable theological expression. By treating the filioque as the latter, Rome has implicitly conceded that its doctrinal pronouncements are not always what they are claimed to be—infallible and irreformable.

The quiet implication is difficult to avoid: the Magisterium can err—and history shows that it has.