The Holocaust Hoax and the Jewish Promotion of Perversity
Benjamin Garland Daily Stormer August 25, 2014 We have fallen a long way in the last few decades, in regard to the filth that is allowed in our society. What happened?If anything you would think that the Jews would be thanking us for defeating the Germans and liberating the millions of the so-called ‘survivors’ from the so-called ‘Nazi death camps.’ That’s not how they operate though. They believe that there is a hatred for them that lies somewhere in all gentiles and that we can begin Holocausting them out of nowhere at any time.
This constant state of paranoia that the Jews live in is exacerbated by the fact that they ruthlessly exploit any society they are allowed to live in. Just simply allowing people to know the truth about their behavior is enough to guarantee their deportation to Israel at the very least, so they are forced to lie and suppress the truth constantly. This reality causes them to harbor a burning hatred and fanatical aggression toward all non-Jews.
The only way for the Jews to quell this fear of the gentiles turning on them is by completely neutralizing and weakening us so as to make an organized resistance, as what happened in 1930s Germany, impossible.
The promotion of sexual perversion, pornography and obscenity is one of the biggest weapons in the Jews’ arsenal for achieving this aim. The deliberate moral corruption of society can thus be seen as a preventative measure against a potential future Holocaust. The more people are masturbating and thinking about sex, the less they are thinking about what the Jews are doing—much less organizing to fight against them. This makes the Jews nervous.This doesn’t.Sexual immorality weakens a nation in many ways, not the least of which is by breaking down the nuclear family. The use of pornography, in particular, is very harmful to men. It strips them of their masculinity and makes them docile, weak and apathetic.
An overt example of how the Jews have purposely used pornography as a weapon to destabilize an enemy is when Israeli soldiers took over Palestinian TV stations in 2002 and immediately started broadcasting porn over the airwaves. Professor E. Michael Jones wrote about this:
“The Israelis have recently shown themselves well-versed in what one could call the military use of pornography. At 4:30 PM on March 30, 2002, Israeli military forces took over Palestinian TV stations when they occupied Ramallah in the West Bank, immediately shutting them down. What followed was a little more unusual. Shortly after occupying the Al-Watan TV station, the Israeli forces began broadcasting pornography over its transmitter. Eventually, according to a report from The Advertiser, an Australian newspaper, the Israelis expanded their cultural offensive against the Palestinian people by broadcasting pornography over two other Palestinian stations, the Ammwaj and Al-Sharaq channels. One 52-year-old Palestinian mother of three children, according to the report in The Advertiser, complained about ‘the deliberate psychological damage caused by these broadcasts.‘”
Jews view White people in the West as every bit of an enemy to them as the Palestinian Arabs in the Middle East. Injecting pornography into Western culture had to be done through a much less overt process than what had been done in Palestine though, as their war against the West has been a subversive one, rather than a military one. The Holocaust and the Sexual Revolution
Pornography—and perversity in general—was accepted into the White world after a long process, through the pseudo-scientific theories of the gentile-hating Jew Sigmund Freud. Freud began developing what is called “psychoanalysis” in Vienna in the late 19th century.
The theory of psychoanalysis is basically that when a person is sexually repressed, frustration builds in their subconscious mind and it eventually causes them mental health problems (including Antisemitism, which the Jews regard as a mental disease).
The traditional practice of suppressing vices such as pornography and homosexuality was demonized by Freudians as being “repressive,” and thus unhealthy to society. Restrictions that had been put into place in the civilized White Western world as a safeguard against the sexual addiction, disease, increase in sex crimes, destruction of the nuclear family and general lowering of morality that the allowing of pornography into a society inevitably leads to, were instead deemed to be the root of all problems in the world. Sigmund Freud, such a friendly looking Jew.Freud’s theories were picked up and promoted heavily by many Jews who recognized how beneficial they were to their ethnic interest. Not only did psychoanalysis explain Antisemitism in such a way that let Jewish behavior off of the hook, it was also a great tool for destroying and confusing the minds of their gentile enemies.
Coupling Freud’s psychoanalysis with the theories of another hateful Jew, Karl Marx, a group of Jewish intellectuals started a think tank in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1921, called the Institute of Social Research, with the explicit intent of bringing down the existing social order of the West.
After Hitler came to power in 1933, the Institute for Social Research knew their gig was up in Germany, so they packed their bags and emigrated to New York City and set up what came to be known as the “Frankfurt School.” There they immediately resumed their subversive activities, now targeting their new host, America, who had just welcomed them with open arms.
Influential books by Frankfurt School Jews such as The Authoritarian Personality by Theodor Adorno, Eros and Civilization by Herbert Marcuse, and The Mass Psychology of Fascism, The Sexual Revolution and The Function of the Orgasm, by Wilhelm Reich, all made the same insane argument that Western civilization was fundamentally sick and inherently evil and Antisemitic, and could only be cured through the eradication of all sexual restraints, even (or even especially) in children.
The influence of the Frankfurt School Jews cannot be underestimated. Wilhelm Reich (who had been a direct pupil of Freud), for one, is no small figure – he is considered the “father of the sexual revolution.” Reich, who was a strong and outspoken proponent of the sexualization of children, was an extremist who claimed that all problems stem from people not having enough orgasms, and that if everyone would just have as many orgasms as they can, as often as possible, all of society’s ills would be cured.
As crazy as that sounds, he was taken very seriously by the 60s radicals on college campuses throughout Europe and America, thanks to the broad, tightly-knit, ethnic network of Jews in Academia and media who promoted his and the Frankfurt School’s works, giving them the air of respectability. “It would be wrong to hold the view that all of what happened in Auschwitz was typically German. It was typical for a society that suppresses sexuality.” – From the 1967 book Society and Evil by Arno Plack, who was a confused and guilt-ridden post WWII German intellectual, trying to come to terms with the Jewish lies about his parents generation.The 60s generation was ripe for accepting the ideas of Reich and his ilk, having been born during or right after the most brutal war of all time and living in the midst of another seemingly senseless war, Vietnam. And they were being told by these Jews that the Holocaust—and war in general—was the result of the sexual repression of their parents’ generation. If only we had “free love,” we wouldn’t have any war, the argument went, and so “make love, not war,” became the slogan and attitude of the day.
The sadistic brutality of the Holocaust story and the dishonesty it would take to tell such a monstrous lie were so alien to the soul of the White man that he bought it hook, line and sinker, and ended up perversely ashamed of his own kind and naively sympathetic toward his enemy, the Jew.
The post-WWII West was left puzzled as to how such a thing as the Holocaust could possibly happen. This period is often referred to as “struggling to come to terms with the Holocaust.” What Freud and his successors in the Frankfurt School had already been saying for years was now validated: The Germans had been sexually repressed, so a Holocaust was inevitable, and so the best way to prevent another Holocaust is to become “liberated” from any and all sexual morals.
This laid the groundwork for the sexual revolution that took place in the 1960s—the horrors of which we are still living with today:
Over 50% of all marriages now end in divorce. Children are having sex at earlier and earlier ages and have access to the most depraved, soul-crushing pornography imaginable with the click of a button on their smartphones or laptops. Homosexuality is basically normalized, with pedophilia and bestiality on the way. Sexually transmitted diseases and illicit pregnancies are on the rise. Tens of millions of babies have been murdered by abortions and the birth rate of the White race has dropped well below replacement level—with White women of child-bearing age making up only 1-2% of the world’s population—guaranteeing its rapid extinction unless there is a radical reversal of current trends.
In other words, Western society has been absolutely decimated by this Jewish instigated “sexual revolution.”
The Jews, on the other hand, have come to be the undisputed masters of the world since the end of WWII, while Antisemitism has been in a steady decline.
“Repression”“Liberation”Origins of the Holocaust Myth
Most people will understandably have a programmed, knee-jerk response to questioning the Holocaust narrative, due to the massive amounts of propaganda they have been exposed to and the magnitude of the lie.
How can such a big lie exist? It has to be true, right?
But, upon taking a step back, if one is willing to do so, the reason for the existence of the Holocaust story makes perfect sense: war propaganda. The so-called “Holocaust” is propaganda in an ongoing war between the Jews and those with the courage to stand up to them—a war that began with the National Socialists coming to power in Germany in the 1930s and continues to this very day. The Jews do not have the means or the numbers to defeat Europeans with the force of arms so they have to rely mainly on infiltration, subversion, and economic and psychological warfare, with the Holocaust hoax being the best example of the latter.
The Holocaust story is not just simply psychological warfare against White Europeans though, it is also absolutely essential to the survival of Jewish supremacy, as any study of the Nazis rise to power will inevitably show the justification they had in opposing the Jews who had been wrecking their nation. All information about that era of German’s history has to be juxtaposed with stories of sadistic mass murder in order to diffuse the reality of the situation, which is that the Germans were completely justified in persecuting and expelling the Jews (which is all that was actually happening), just as we would be today.
Hitler and the National Socialists freed Germany from the death grip of the Jews and gave it back to the German people who subsequently turned it into the world’s foremost super power in a very short time. This posed a grave threat to the highly organized Jewish power base worldwide by exposing their machinations for the world to see. Samuel Untermyer.Naturally, International Jewry, and Jews in general, hated Hitler and the Germans for this and wanted them destroyed. The only way to convince the American people, 50% of whom were of German ancestry themselves, to go to war with their European brothers was by using their control over the American media to spread atrocity propaganda of the worst kind.
The Jewish propaganda campaign against Germany started virtually immediately after Hitler came to power in 1933. Samuel Untermyer, speaking on behalf of Jewry worldwide, declared war on Germany with an economic boycott—an act of war the same as a gunshot or a bomb.
Shortly after that, Untermyer gave an hysterical radio broadcast denouncing the Germans as “ingrates” and “cruel and savage beasts,” and calling for Christians to unite with the Jews to destroy Germany in a “sacred war.” Untermyer claimed that the Germans were “annihilating” the Jews by:
locking them in vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.
Even the official historical narrative of today only says that the so-called “extermination” of Jews, and the widespread utilization of concentration camps in Germany did not begin until 1939, yet this was only 1933 and Untermyer was already making clear and direct references to what we now know as the “Holocaust.”
How is that possible? That fact alone (along with no real evidence to the contrary) is proof that the Holocaust story is just the result of Jewish propaganda, rather than an actual happening. Furthermore, the Jews had been pushing the “six million” figure going back many decades, as early as 1897. Most Jews in the world probably read the transcript of Untermyer’s declaration of war on Germany, which was printed in full in the New York Times. It is easy to see how they all get on the same page, by simply following the Jewish press. A lot of them probably believed the lies of their leadership, but I have a feeling whether or not the Holocaust was/is true or not is of little importance to the Jews because they collectively benefit off of it. It is “good for the Jews.”Jews have been pushing the mythical “six million” figure since as far back as the late 19th century. There are dozens of examples of articles claiming that six million Jews were being starved, persecuted and/or exterminated in various different European countries. The above article, from 1919, is one in which they actually even used the term “Holocaust.”The wartime propaganda used to demonize Hitler and Germany that eventually evolved into what is now known as the “Holocaust,” was (and still is) the perfect excuse for the Jews and their allies to justify carrying out the most destructive war of all time.
The Jews saw how they could greatly benefit from the Holocaust hoax after the war in many ways, including painting themselves as the world’s eternal victims, raking in billions of dollars in ‘reparation’ payments, demonizing any and all opposition to them as ‘Nazis who want to kill six million Jews,’ and, as this article is attempting to show, weakening gentile society by corrupting our morals through the spread of obscenity. From the ‘Suicide Girls’ to ‘Schindler’s List’
A standout feature in most stories about the “Holocaust” is the extreme perversity included in them. This, as anyone even vaguely familiar with the Holocaust industry knows, is done to traumatize people into sympathizing with the “poor, inoffensive Jews,” for what they supposedly had to endure during WWII.
The Jews also use the “Holocaust” as leverage to get people to accept perverse garbage that would otherwise be deemed unfit for public consumption. Under the pretense of trying to prevent atrocities such as the alleged “Holocaust” from ever happening again, the Jews force us to accept viewing and reading the most shocking and grotesque imagery that their demented minds can conjure up. People normally would not allow their children to look at piles of dead corpses, for example, yet this is occurring a grand scale in schools every single year—it’s even required by law in many areas.
A New York Times news story titled “93 Jewish Girls Who Choose Suicide Before Nazi Shame” that surfaced in 1943 is one of the aforementioned propaganda lies that were instrumental in whipping the Americans into an intense anti-German fervor. Jewish author Josh Lambert, in his eye-opening 2013 book Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews and American Culture had this to say about the myth of the “93 Suicide Girls,” and the Jewish spreading of anti-German sentiment in general:
Images of Nazis as sexual criminals, as rapists and defilers of Jewish women, whether based on fact or on fantasy, proliferated in the United States along with the earliest reports of the Holocaust. In one crucial and resonant case, on January 8, 1943, the New York Times, . . . printed in full the translated text of a Yiddish letter received in New York that purported to tell the story of “ninety-three Jewish girls and young Jewish women” in a Bais Yakov religious school who “chose mass suicide to escape being forced into prostitution by German soldiers” in Krakow in August 1942. Despite doubts about the letter’s veracity, the story of this incident spread widely and continues to be retold to this day as fact.
Even Yad Hashem, the World Center for Holocaust Research, openly admits that this story is a myth that never happened.Lambert went on to talk about the mass promotion and far-reaching influence that the myth of the “93 Suicide Girls” had on American popular culture following its release:
. . . the story compelled attention and inspired creativity in the United States. Within months, the ninety-three martyred girls had become the subject of at least two published poems–one written in English, the other translated from Hebrew into English–and one English-language short story. In the postwar years, the story also seems to have partly inspired novels which depict concentration camp brothels filled with Jewish women: Yehiel Dinur’s House of Dolls, translated to English and published in the United States in 1955, and Edward Lewis Wallant’s The Pawnbroker (1961).
Holohoaxer Ka-Tzetnik, real name Yehiel Dinur, dramatically passed out after a few minutes of testimony at the bizarre show trial of National Socialist Adolf Eichmann.House of Dolls, first translated into English in 1955, is an extremely disturbing book that was written by a mentally insane Jew who called himself “Ka-Tzetnik 135633” (“Ka-Tzetnik” means “concentration camper” and “135633” was his prisoner number). House of Dolls was the second Holocaust book by “Ka-Tzetnik” in, as one Jewish journalist put it, a “string of often lurid novel-memoirs, works that shock the reader with grotesque scenes of torture, perverse sexuality, and cannibalism” It was also, of course, a complete hoax.
The scenario in Tzetnik’s book takes place in an alleged Nazi brothel called the “Joy Division,” where Jewesses were forced into prostitution. “Ka-Tzetnik 135633” is generally considered a hoaxster and his work is generally accepted as being nothing but fantasy, and is commonly referred to as “Holocaust pornography.”
The claim of Nazis having sex with Jewish prostitutes goes against the Nuremberg racial purity laws and flies in the face of the official narrative of the Nazis being hardcore racists, making it too far-fetched even for the Jews to get behind. The idea for Tzeknik’s disgusting book no doubt came from the “93 Suicide Girls” article, which is also, as previously stated, a known hoax. Holocaust hoax stories give a frightening insight into the Jewish mind.The Pawnbroker was another Holocaust novel that was inspired by the “93 Suicide Girls” article. It was adapted into a movie in 1964 by the Jew Sidney Lumet and became the very first movie allowed to break the Production Code for nudity—showing the nude breasts of a Negress prostitute—on the predictable argument that it was necessary for telling the “full story.” The trivia section on the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) page for the movie says this:
After the filmmakers appealed to the MPAA’s appeals board to oppose censoring the film, it became the first US film to show a nude woman from the waist up and be granted a Production Code Seal. It was the first of a series of confrontations between filmmakers and the MPAA in the 1960s that would lead to the abandonment of the Code within five years in favor of a ratings system.
Nude breasts of a Negress: crucial to learning the lessons of the Holohoax.The film’s success was based largely on the controversy surrounding the nudity. So while the producers used the importance of telling the Holohoax story to convince the censors by claiming it was “necessary to the movie” and “moral,” it could be surmised that in this case, as far as to the public at large, they were using nudity to sell the Holocaust, rather than the other way around.
So while the Holocaust was cleverly and successfully used to get nudity past the censors, the nudity was in turn used to sell the Holocaust fantasy to the gentile masses. A movie about something as dark as the Holocaust was still a tough sell for the largely Christian, not yet as demoralized American public, but nudity was not. Most men cannot resist such a thing. 90% of all men have probably seen the godawful movie Swordfish for the same reason, to give a contemporary example. It’s rumored that Halle Berry was paid $500,000 for this one shot in the movie Swordfish.Things got even more bizarre on the Holohoax front after House of Dolls and The Pawnbroker. Those two stories led directly to the advent of ‘Naziploitation’ films, which are campy, over-the-top, sex and gore, horror fantasy films about evil, cartoonish German Nazis conducting all kinds of weird experiments on Jewish concentration camp prisoners.
From the “93 Suicide Girls,” to the ‘Naziploitation’ films, these bizarre and perverted tales are still sometimes presented to the public as reality, though not really defended as real to anyone who does any real research. Much like the shrunken Jew heads or Jew soap or Jew lampshades, the stories have long since been discredited, and are admitted to be false even by mainstream Jewish historians—but if you don’t know that, the Jews aren’t exactly going to go out of their way to tell you. Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS, released in 1975, is the most infamous and influential of all of the ‘Naziploitation’ genre films.Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS—the king of all ‘Naziploitation’ films—opens with a written statement claiming that the movie is based on a true story and needs to be seen in order that it “will never occur again.” Within 5 seconds of watching the film you see two people having graphic sex with a clear display of actual penetration. Ilsa is a truly sick movie, almost beyond belief.
Claiming that Ilsa has anything to do with real life events or that it contains uncomfortable truths that need to be seen in order to prevent them from happening again, is an insult to even the dumbest viewer’s intelligence. It is clearly nothing more than trashy, pornographic smut.
I watched this horrible movie on YouTube, by the way, the same place that a child could. Intro to the sick and pornographic Holocaust propaganda film Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS.This is the synopsis for Ilsa:
Ilsa is Kommandant of a Nazi prison camp, who conducts sadistic scientific experiments designed to demonstrate that women are more capable of enduring pain than men are, and therefore should be allowed to fight in the army. Ilsa is also portrayed as a buxom woman with a voracious sexual appetite for men. Every night, she chooses another one of her male prisoners and rapes him; however, due to her insatiable hunger, she gets disappointed when her current victim eventually ejaculates, and promptly has him castrated and put to death. Only an American prisoner, who can withhold ejaculating, manages to use her weakness to his favor.
Just imagine the “chutzpah” of claiming that a b-grade Jewish torture porn movie such as that is based on “documented fact.” Those wacky Nazis, with their silly experiments.This is EXACTLY how the Holocaust happened.“TGB” (Typical German Behavior)Ilsa is only one of many filthy “Naziploixtation” genre films. Here are the covers of a few more of them: Last Orgy of the Third ReichLove Camp 7Salon Kitty aka Madam KittyHell CampCamp of Perversion aka Nathalie: Escape from HellGetting back to literature for a moment, let’s explore what is maybe the most famous Holocaust story of all time, the so-called Diary of Anne Frank, first published in 1952.
The ‘Diary,’ which is an obvious fraud—written well beyond the capabilities of a 12 or 13-year-old girl—is laced with pornographic and sexually subversive passages.
In the book, Anne opines that parents should “[tell] their sons and daughters everything [about sex] at the age of twelve” and that “it’s not wrong for a man to bring a little experience to a marriage. After all, it has nothing to do with the marriage itself, does it?”
Anne ponders how she would describe her genitalia to a boy she likes:
. . . In the upper part, between the outer labia, there’s a fold of skin that, on second thought, looks like a kind of a blister. That’s the clitoris. Then come the inner labia, which are also pressed together in a kind of crease. When they open up, you can see a fleshy little mound, no bigger than the top of my thumb. The upper part has a couple of small holes in it, which is where the urine comes out. The lower part looks as if it were just skin, and yet that’s where the vagina is. You can barely find it, because the folds of skin hide the opening. The hole’s so small I can hardly imagine how a man could get in there, much less how a baby could come out. It’s hard enough trying to get your index finger inside. That’s all there is, and yet it plays such an important role!
Anne was also a bisexual degenerate with homosexual fantasies, apparently:
Unconsciously, I had these feelings even before I came here. Once when I was spending the night at Jacque’s, I could no longer restrain my curiosity about her body, which she’d always hidden from me and which I’d never seen. I asked her whether, as proof of our friendship, we could touch each other’s breasts. Jacque refused. I also had a terrible desire to kiss her, which I did. Every time I see a female nude, such as the Venus in my art history book, I go into ecstasy. Sometimes I find them so exquisite I have to struggle to hold back my tears. If only I had a girlfriend!
Really, Anne? Really?What adult wouldn’t blush reading trash like this—supposedly written by a pre-teen girl—much less want to expose their young sons and daughters to it? Yet every year children read the Anne Frank story in elementary schools all across America and the world.
It is much harder for one to object to questionable material when it is contained in stories about the Holocaust though. That’s the Jewish trick. Anyone who objects is made out to be an evil person who must love the extermination of innocent Jews, Fascism and Hitler.
A good microcosm of how this Jewish propaganda tactic works is found in the comment section of an article on the Jewish news outlet Huffington Post about a mother who objected to exposing 7th grade students to the inappropriate material found in Anne Frank’s ‘Diary’: Pretty neat how this works huh? If you don’t want your kids reading pornographic filth about clitorises and lesbianism, then you must be a book-burning, fascist sympathizer who loves death and genocide.Now that we have touched on how the Jews have used their Holocaust hoax as a sinister tool to successfully promote perversity in movies, literature and Academia, let’s look at what they have accomplished with it in regard to network television. War and Remembrance was a 12 part mini-series about WWII that aired in 1988, and featured the “Holocaust” as its main focal point.Just as the first theatrical movie to break the Production Code for nudity was a Holohoax film, so was the first to manage to get it onto prime time television. It was the miniseries War and Remembrance. It says this on the trivia page of the series’ IMDb:
In the “death camp” segment there is a shot of several nude “bodies” showing women’s breasts. This was the first time that nudity was shown on network TV in prime time.
An article from 1988 found on the Los Angeles Times website explains how ABC had to make a deal with the Jewish director to allow him to show nudity, in order for him to agree to filming the project:
ABC was able to hook him by promising him a budget far above the ordinary for a TV miniseries and agreeing to give him free reign to depict the graphic horror of the Holocaust–including extreme violence and nudity.
“I told them to forget the rest of it–I didn’t know how I was going to do the Battle of Midway, I didn’t know how I was going to do submarine warfare and all of that stuff–but on the Holocaust,” Curtis recalled, “I cannot be censored. How can you worry about seeing frontal nudity when you’re talking about massacring 11 million people?”
The same excuse of wanting to show the full ‘reality’ of the so-called Holocaust was used to air the chief Holohoax film of all time, Schindler’s List, uncensored, on TV in 1997.
Schindler’s List took this clever subversion technique a step further though; along with the dozens of naked victims shown being abused and exterminated by the Nazis in the film, it also features non-gas chamber related nudity that has nothing to do with the so-called Holocaust, such as Schindler having sex with a woman and multiple women lying on beds with their breasts exposed.
The film was also shown during “prime time,” at 7 o’clock on a Sunday to 65 million viewers, many of them children, and has been aired unedited ever since. Holocaust education for ze goyim childrens.Children must watch Liam Neeson have sex so they will not repeat the Holocaust. Never again!Never forget that women laid in beds naked while Jews were being Holocausted and converted into lampshades, soap and other useful Nazi accessories.The only public figure to come out against this travesty was a conservative Republican Senator, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who said the airing had taken network television “to an all-time low, with full frontal nudity, violence and profanity being shown in our homes.” and that “the fact that it aired on public television on a Sunday evening during a family time should outrage parents and decent-minded individuals everywhere.”
Coburn was viciously attacked on all fronts for these comments, even by fellow conservatives, demonstrating just how enslaved we have become to the Jews and their lies. Just 40 years earlier, prior to The Pawnbroker, there had still been censors in place preventing nudity in theatrical films—much less prime time television—but by 1997 there was just one man (who, by the way, later apologized due to pressure) who would object to it publicly.
Coburn’s position was, undoubtedly, the rational position that spoke to the best interests of the public, yet he was portrayed in the media as an immoral person with some kind of sinister agenda.
There was an all out Kosher Jihad unleashed on Coburn, simply for his stating of the obvious:
GOP activist William Bennett said: “These are very unfortunate and foolish comments. Coburn’s view obscures, even obliterates, the distinction between gratuitous violence and nudity — that is violence and nudity to titillate — and violence and human realism essential to the telling of an important story or historical truth.”
Sen Alfonse D’Amato, a New York Republican, said “To equate the nudity of the Holocaust victims in the concentration camp with any sexual connotations is outrageous and offensive.”
NBC West Coast president Don Olhmeyer said “I just wonder if Congressman Coburn is aware that there was a Holocaust, that millions of people died and it’s not something anybody should ever forget. We think that Congressman Coburn’s statement should send a chill through every intelligent and fair-minded person in America.”
Two-time Republican Presidential nominee Jack Kemp said that “Failure to recognize the value of such programming is disappointing and disturbing.”
What’s next, mandatory Holohoax pornography for Kindergarteners? And you’re an evil Nazi if you object to it? Senator Tom Coburn (A secret Nazi who wants to kill six million Jews, no doubt.)When is Enough going to be Enough?
This topic of this article is just one aspect of the how the Holocaust story has been weaponized against us. It is also simultaneously used as the excuse for massive third world immigration into White countries, and the denial of any racial consciousness among Whites.
In fact, as hard of a pill as it is to swallow, the Jews are using their made up story of genocide as the primary tool to pull off a very real, much worse genocide, with the entire White race as their victims!
So even if the ridiculous Holocaust story was based on actual fact, if it means that we must be turned into a bunch of degenerates and eventually bred out of existence, then obviously the only sensible course of action would be for us to stop caring about it.
Why not forget about the alleged suffering that the Jews went through at the hands of our kind in the past, and start caring about the suffering being inflicted on us, right here in the present, at the hands of the Jew? Our current situation under the jackboot of these demons is more extreme and alarming than any Holocaust fairy tale that they could ever come up with. That much is certain. He tried to stop it. Source: http://www.dailystormer.com/the-holocaust-hoax-and-the-jewish-promotion-of-perversity/
Holohoax 101 - The Fundamentals of the Holocaust Hoax
The First Holohoax, During World War One
The book The First Holocaust, Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with Holocaust Claims During and After World War One by Don Heddeshemimer is documented with reprints of articles from the New York Times and other Jewish press that claimed that there was a holocaust of the Jews during World War One. For example, see the article by Martin Glynn, the former Mayor of New York, describing a holocaust of six million Jews published in 1919 at http://codoh.com/library/document/871 Heddesheimer missed the systematic and murderous extermination of six million Jews in 1906, as reported in the New York Times, see http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/2010/01/ny-times-reports-in-1906-that-russias.html
From a review of the book on amazon.com, "I guess they would call it 'Chutzpah', to publicly use the same big lie twice within the span of twenty or so years." Note: Amazon removed the quoted review.
Rabbi Stephen Wise, founder of the American Jewish Congress and assistant to Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, the leader of the Zionist movement in the US, was instrumental in creating the WW I hoax, and led the efforts to resurrect the hoax during WW II.
A Gas Chamber With a View
According to the USHMM website - "Between 1941 and 1944, Nazi German authorities deported millions of Jews from Germany, from occupied territories, and from the countries of many of its Axis allies to ghettos and to killing centers, often called extermination camps, where they were murdered in specially developed gassing facilities."
There are now only six alleged 'death camps', four were razed before the end of the war, and two, Auschwitz and Majdanek, are still standing. There are visitors tours at Auschwitz and Majdanek, and they culminate at 'specially developed gassing facilities', or gas chambers. Let's have a look - this is the door to the 'gas chamber' at Auschwitz - Yes, that is a window, and it is unbarred. The door itself is a typical wooden office door, it is not sealed. A visitor recently asked a guide why the prisoners didn't break the window and escape, the guide replied that an armed guard was stationed outside the door. That is, they really expect people to believe that this was a 'gas chamber', and, amazingly, people do. The 'gas chamber' is actually a morgue room in a crematorium.
This is a picture of the 'gas chamber' at Majdanek, and yes, that is an unbarred window.
The Majdanek hoax gas chamber is a fumigation room, where Zyklon, an insecticide used all over Europe to kill lice to prevent the spread of typhus, was used to delouse clothing. A building containing several fumigation rooms still exists at Auschwitz, complete with the special machinery used to generate, distribute, and exhaust the gas produced by Zyklon. These rooms at Auschwitz are never shown to visitors. The fumigation rooms became the 'homicidal gas chambers' of the holohoax.
The hoax gas chambers at Auschwitz and Majdanek are the only 'gas chambers' in existence.
Dr. Charles Larson headed a team of forensic pathologists sent into the camps at the end of the war to document war crimes. They conducted hundreds of autopsies at more than twenty camps, they did not find a single body showing signs of gas poisioning. None have been found since, at any camp.
The Photos
For sixty years the media has inundated the world with photos of typhus victims taken by the British after the war at Belsen presented as evidence of Nazi gassings. Belsen was a concentration camp in Germany. Near the end of the war as the Soviet troops approached the camps in the east, including Auschwitz, prisoners were transferred to camps in the west. At Belsen there was overcrowding, the facilities broke down, there was inadequate food, supplies, and medicine, and there was a resulting typhus epidemic that killed 35,000 people, for a recent report see http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-11-19-holocaust-papers_x.htm Everyone has seen the photos of Belsen typhus victims presented as holocaust gassing victims, and everyone suppresses the obvious truth, that the prisoners had not been gassed, they were emaciated and had died of disease. Watch the first minute of the televised visit of Oprah Winfrey and Elie Wiesel to Auschwitz http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KugVjbq6Si8. Auschwitz is the main hoax 'death camp' where 10,000 Jews were supposedly gassed daily! The show begins with Oprah at the gates of Auschwitz, but at 58 seconds in the scene shifts to video of bodies being bulldozed into mass graves as Oprah intones "Evil has a name, the holocaust. A systematic mass murder, meticulously planned and executed by Nazi Germany that brutally wiped millions of people off the face of the earth. More than six million of those human beings were Jewish." But the video is not of prisoners gassed at Auschwitz during the war, it was taken by British/US troops at Belsen after the war ended and shows prisoners who had died in the tyhpus epidemic. Why are they lying about the photos? Because there are no real photos of gassing victims, just as there is not a single autopsied body of a gassing victim, for the simple reason that there were no gassing victims, the Nazi gas chambers are pure fiction. Who is lying about the photos? Oprah is lying, but she most likely doesn't know it, and wouldn't care if she did. If your middle school or high school teacher presents the photos as victims of Nazi gassing, then he/she is also lying and probably doesn't know it. But, anyone who knows anything about the holocaust does knows the truth of the photos, so many of the people lying about the photos do know the truth. In particular, the purposeful liars include the 'eyewitnesses', academics, USHMM, Yad Vashem, and the entire news establishment. The most startling thing about the holohoax is that every establishment organization in the US is participating fully, by actively telling outrageous lies as in the Oprah show, or by allowing the lies to stand without challenge, and suppressing any challenge that does occur. There is not one newspaper in the US that will print the truth about the photos, even in a letter to the editor.
Not all of the prisoners died but you have never seen pictures of the ones who didn't, like those in the photo. A documentary movie made was made by the British, directed by Alfred Hitchcock no less, with footage shot when they entered Belsen, it is the source of the photo. The movie was shelved for 50 years but can now be seen here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/camp/ . A comprehensive collection of photos can be seen at http://www.bergenbelsen.co.uk/pages/Database/SurvivorsPhotos.asp?index=0 . Josef Kramer was the commandant at Belsen, and captured documents show that he did everything he could to prevent the catastrophe that engulfed the camp. He was tried and hanged at the end of the war. The letter he wrote to the camp administration requesting more food, medicine, supplies, etc., can be seen here http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Belsen/Kramer010345.html .
His case is eerily similar to that of Captain Henry Wirz, who headed the Andersonville prison at the end of the US Civil War. Wirz was also tried and hanged. To read an account of his hoax trial, see http://www.holohoax101.org/wirz/. Wirz's trial was the first 'war crimes' trial and is often cited as the precedent for Nuremberg. Remarkably, (or not), Wirz is still portrayed as a 'war criminal' in the US media.
The Documents
The Nazis kept meticulous records in the camps, including death certificates for every prisoner that died, and 'Death Books' summarizing the deaths. The Soviets captured the Auschwitz records but hid them for 45 years. A stone plaque was placed at the Auschwitz entrance stating that 4 million had died there.
In the early 90's the Russians released the documents. Samples, and a summary analysis, can be seen here http://www.holohoax101.org/auschwitzmuseum/. The data shows that more Roman Catholics died at Auschwitz than Jews. The old stone plaque stating that four million had died was replaced by the plaque shown to the left claiming that one and a half million had died. The new number was not documented; based on the documents the figure should be on the order of (some months are missing) one hundred thousand.
Remarkably, (or not), the six million total for Jewish victims of the holocaust was not affected.
The documents captured by the British and US forces, over sixty million documents, have been kept secret to all except the holohoax 'authorities' at Bad Arolsen to this day.
The Survivors
The holohoax is based on lies told by the 'survivors'. The three most famous holocaust survivors, Elie Wiesel, Otto Frank, and Primo Levi, have something in common - when the Soviet army approached Auschwitz, they were all in camp hospitals, there were several, the main Auschwitz hospital is shown to the left. Elie Wiesel was being treated for an infected foot. The Nazis gave him the option of waiting to be liberated by the Soviets, or evacuating to the west. Wiesel, with his father, chose to leave with the Nazis. This is related in his book Night describing his year at Auschwitz. When Wiesel was in Auschwitz the Nazis were supposedly killing 10,000 Jews per day in gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. There is not a single mention of gas chambers in the book, Wiesel writes that the Nazis killed the Jews by throwing them alive into burning pits, one for children, one for adults. Anne Frank and Otto Frank, her father, were first taken to Auschwitz. They were there when the Soviets approached. Otto had contracted tyhpus and was in the camp hospital, and was liberated by the Soviets. Anne was transferred west where she died of typhus in the epidemic at Belsen. Primo Levi was also in the Auschwitz hospital and was liberated by the Soviets.
Abraham Bomba describes how barbers at Treblinka gave haircuts to roomfuls of naked women in the gas chambers, including their wives, sisters, and mothers, just before their executions in the very same room. He was featured in the movie Shoah documenting the holocaust. His absurd 'testimony' can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXweT1BgQMk. This is a must see. Yehuda Bauer, Director of Research at Yad Vashem writes in the introduction to survivor Filip Mueller's book Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers "This is a unique document indeed, it is the testimony of the only man who saw the Jewish people die and lived to tell what he saw." Mueller begins in the morning, "where some 500 prisoners had lined up in rows of 10 so that they might enjoy their Sunday rest according to established Auschwitz tradition." The kapo then barks orders to the prisoners to take off and replace their caps. Those not fast enough are bludgeoned to death. One new prisoner speaks up, "I'm sure the people in charge know nothing whatever about this. I protest." He is bludgeoned to death. "As a result of this mornings sporting activities, thirty-five bludgeoned bodies now lay in the yard of Block 11. However our harassment was by no means at an end. Although by now we were exhausted we stood in line behind wooden tea vats. The tea should have been served early in the morning and was now STONE COLD." All you have to do to realize the holohoax is pure phantasmagoria is to read actual 'testimony' of the only man who saw the Jewish people die and lived to tell what he saw.
Nuremberg
None of the defendants at Nuremberg admitted to any part of the holocaust or any direct knowledge of the holocaust, and only one, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, head of the Reich Security Main Office, was charged with having an operational role in the killing of Jews. He testified as follows:
DR. KAUFFMANN: What attitude did you adopt when you heard about it?
KALTENBRUNNER: I had no knowledge of Hitler's order to Heydrich regarding the final solution of the Jewish problem at the time I took up my office. In the summer of 1943 I gathered from the foreign press and through the enemy radio...
That is, he testified that he had no direct part in the holocaust, and only learned of it via the foreign press and enemy radio. See the testimony here http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/04-11-46.asp Kaltenbrunner also testified
COL. BROOKHART: Witness after witness, by testimony and affidavit, has said that the gas chamber killings were done on general or specific orders of Kaltenbrunner.
KALTENBRUNNER: Show me one of those men or any of those orders. It is utterly impossible.
COL. BROOKHART: Practically all of the orders came through Kaltenbrunner.
KALTENBRUNNER: Entirely impossible. The only man charged at Nuremberg with participation in the holocaust did not plead that he was "Following orders', he testified that it was "Entirely impossible". More Kaltenbrunner testimony, don't miss it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcApkZx3Ojk
Brainwashing Then
The holohoax brainwashing got into full swing immediately at the end of WW II. Within a week of the capture of Buchenwald, the famous Hollywood director Billy Wilder was in the camp making a film of propaganda lies that still circulate to this day. An inadvertent picture of Wilder on the set at Buchenwald is shown to the left. The film, complete with props, claimed that the Nazis made soap from the fat of (Jewish only of course) prisoners, made lampshades from the skin of prisoners, and shrunk the heads of prisoners like in the Amazon. Even the holohoax establishment now admits these were all lies. The Nazis investigated any suspected crimes in the camps, and these investigations were headed by Judge Konrad Morgen. In the course of investigating Karl Koch, the commandant at Buchenwald, for the charge of having three prisoneres killed, he also investigated reports of the 'irregularities' like the ones listed above and found them to be unfounded. Koch, on the other hand, was found guilty and hanged. Morgen was tortured at Nuremberg to confirm the reports of irregularites at Buchenwald but refused. See http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/trials/konradmorgen.html
Brainwashing Now
The Jews are making every effort to brainwash the US public to believe the holohoax, and holohoax education is now mandated in many states, starting in KINDERGARTEN, and continuing through all grades. The cover of the Florida manual for holohoax education for K-3 students is shown to the left. You can find the laws regarding holohoax education in your state at http://www.ushmm.org/educators/beyond-our-walls-state-profiles-on-holocaust-education
RED CROSS EXPOSES “JEWISH” HOLOCAUST HOAX: INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS (IRC) DOCUMENT CONFIRMS 271 THOUSAND NOT 6 MILLION DIED IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS
TG: “This appeared in Ireland in the Kilkenny Journal and was sent to me by a friend. Here is the link to the original article which I have pasted in full here below:”
Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the Official IRC records reveal the actual Concentration Camp total death toll was 271,301 For years, people around the world – “the West” in particular – have been told that “six million Jews were systematically murdered by Germans in ‘Concentration Camps’ during World War 2.”
Thousands of honest people disputing this claim have been viciously smeared as a hateful anti-Semite. Several countries around the world have jailed and heavily fined people for disputing the claim that “6 Million” Jews were killed.
Provided here is a scanned image of an Official International Red Cross document, proving the so-called “Holocaust” [the long-and-often-claimed-6-million Jews] is just plain wrong. Jews around the world have intentionally exaggerated and perpetually lied for the purpose of gaining political, emotional and business advantages for themselves.
They committed willful, criminal FRAUD upon millions of trusting people around the world!
Please NOTE that the truth has been known since long before 1979!!! The above compiler, replying to a letter, had to rely on information that was already in existence!!!
Tax-payers of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Poland and other nations have had multiple millions of dollars taken from their wages to be paid out to “holocaust survivors” and their descendants for something that DID NOT HAPPEN.
The tax-payers of these United States of America spend Billion$ each year in direct, indirect and military support of the State of Israel (which is not Biblical Israel).
This is intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive as to be almost incomprehensible.
Red Cross and East German government figures put the total deaths at every camp as 272.000, and 282,000 respectively which includes homosexuals, communists, gypsies, murderers, paedophiles etc. The 6 Million figure is a Kabbalist number, a magickal figure which featured in news papers in the early 1900’s
Where do the innocent Germans, Americans and others go to get a refund?
I call for criminal prosecution of individuals and groups who filed false lawsuits to obtain holocaust reparations and financial damage awards and perpetrating deliberate fraud upon Courts.
I call for the removal of Holocaust references in History books and educational materials.
I call for the removal of Holocaust Memorials worldwide.
It is long overdue that this intentional fraud be halted and those who perpetrated it be brought to justice for over 60 years of National Blood Libel against Germany and other nations through vicious lies and financial fraud.
Two of the most important surveys of the Jewish question in Europe during World War II are David Irvings examination of the Russian archives after the wall came down. Irving published his findings in his book, “Hitler’s War” and said not one word about gas chambers.
When question about this omission he said that there was no reference to gas chambers in the archives and therefore he did not discuss the question of gas chambers. Irving was arrested in several countries for hate speech for his scholarly omission.
The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications: “Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946) and “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947).
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Russian camps which were far more harsh.
The German camps held both political prisoners (Schutzhaflinge) and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners.
Grateful prisoners sent letters of thanks from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others.
“The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).
Regarding Theresienstadt, the Red Cross said, “”where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75).
“The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions … From information gathered by the Commmee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6, 1945.
They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642).
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation.
The aid then ceased and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians.
The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.
However. food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.
NO MENTION OF GAS CHAMBERS
One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war.
Says the Report: “in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.
Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.
Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp .I.” (Vol. III, p.83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able.
The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78). B
By October 2, 1944, the ICRC had warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of ‘gas chambers’.
The original 1946 edition did not even talk of ‘extermination’ or ‘death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ (Vol. 1 p. 641) and ‘extermination camps’ (Vol. I p. 645). However, no means of’extermination’ is indicated.
In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a ‘gas chamber’. It acknowledges that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but’ its complete silence on the subject of’gassings’ is ample refutation of the ‘Holocaust’ legend.
NOT ALL WERE INTERNED Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.
This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing every single Jew he could lay his hands on,” In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportian of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland.
Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation.
“The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognise the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary, ” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States… now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. 1, p. 649).
………… Official International Red Cross Records Released Sealed And Guarded Since The End Of WWII At Arolsen, Germany, The Official IRC Records Reveal The Actual Concentration Camp Total Death Toll Was 271,301
The Source of the six million figure is a Talmudic (Jewish Talmud) reference to a future holocaust in which six million Jews die.
The reason why they are claiming six million deaths in Nazi camps, even though that number vastly exceeds the number of Jews in Europe at the time, is because this reference in their scripture is something they fear deeply and wish to prevent at all costs.
The Ashkenazi Jews, which I have experience with honestly believe that prophecy is real, but can be manipulated.
They believe that prophets see into the future, and see what was believed and said, and then write that down as much as they reveal the word of GOD.
SO there is a group of Ashkenazi Jews who wish to make the six million figure HISTORY to prevent it from ever happening in the FUTURE by repeating this number over and over and over into the social concience, in the hope that prophets of old will also latch onto this, and report it as a factual event in the future, which would now be history.
In other words, they believe they can lie themselves a new future. I don’t think so – I think their hardest days are ahead and one thing is certain, the genie is out of the bottle and through the word, the real truth of Fukushima may be like silly putty slowly sinking into the carpet, eventually it will be TOTALLY sunk in the carpet and nothing will get it out.
THIS could cause the six million Jewish deaths the prophecy speaks of, and No, I do not believe they can lie their way out of it.
Note to readers from Teena Gee: Does any reader know where or how to get a copy of this (these) German Red Cross documents? I would like to read the complete reports and explore the details contained in them. As a matter of simple mathematics, if there were less than 5,000 Jews in the whole of Europe at the time, and lets guess that one third relocated, that leaves a remainder of around 3 million – not 6.
I have a book called “Germany” published by Lonely Planet, ISBN: 1740594711 4th Edition published in MAY 2004 and I quote from page 34 which states: (bottom paragraph)
” …Another 165 work camps provided labour for big industry including IG Farbendinustrie AG, producer of the cyanide gas Zyclon B that was used in gas chambers to murder over three million Jews.”
How exactly did we get from 3 million to 6 million? and how did we get to either number when the Red Cross official death record states 271,301?
Blood flows within Man as the nectar inside a tree
It is the elixir whose infinity is lost in flesh
The apparition of ambrosia for the mortal beast
Unfertile ichor whose seed bears no roots
Life is not about flesh but rather the soul’s gradual
departure from it
The source of all life endlessly craves for new passage
Eager to escape the clutches of the maddened gods
For they yearn our body and blood as famished wolves
Thank you,
Joseph Pede Ambrosia & Nectar. The gods neither eat bread nor drink wine, and that is why they are bloodless. Instead they drink and eat Nectar and Ambrosia, and their blood is called Ichor (see below). So, for example Leto did not give Apollo her breast, but Themis poured nectar and ambrosia with her hands. Even though some have considered nectar as a drink, others say that the gods eat nectar: "I eat nectar, chewing it well, and I drink now and then ambrosia." (Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae 2.39a). Otherwise ambrosia is eaten. For when Aphrodite returned with Iris 1 to Olympus from the battlefield at Troy it is said that: "… Iris stayed the horses and loosed them from the car, and cast before them ambrosia to eat." (Homer, Iliad 5.369). Likewise, when Athena and Hera descended from Olympus to the Trojan battlefield, "… Hera stopped her horses…and Simois made ambrosia spring up for them to eat." (Homer, Iliad 5.775). And this is what was believed later on. For Damis is reported to have said to his master Apollonius: "If banquets there be of gods, and gods take food, surely they must have attendants whose business it is that not even the parcels of ambrosia that fall to the ground should be lost." (Flavius Philostratus, Life of Apollonius of Tyana 1.19). And nectar is drunk: when Demeter was troubled with the disappearance of Persephone, she came to the house of Astraeus 1, being there welcomed by the WINDS, who served her refreshing cups of nectar. Later Boreas 1 brought the ambrosia and set it on the table. In similar way, Ganymedes is said to draw the delicious nectar from a mixing-bowl, and carry it round at the feasts of the gods. In any case, it is ambrosia and nectar what the gods consume, and if they were deprived of them they would become breathless, and lie down spiritless and voiceless. And when Zeus took the HECATONCHEIRES as allies against the TITANS bringing them up from the Underworld where they had been imprisoned, he provided them with nectar and ambrosia, thus reviving their spirit. Mortals, on the other hand, are not normally allowed to taste them, and Tantalus 1, who was made immortal with nectar and ambrosia by the gods, is now being punished in the Underworld for having stolen the divine food and drink. Yet it is said that Athena mixed ambrosia, and brought it to those who were hidden in the WOODEN HORSE to appease their hunger. Because of the properties of ambrosia, which some say it is nine times sweeter than honey (Ath.2.39), it may also be used for preservation; for Thetis shed ambrosia and nectar through the dead Patroclus 1's nostrils, so that his flesh might keep hale. She also anointed her son Achilles with ambrosia to help destroy the mortal element which the child had inherited from its father Peleus. Likewise, the fragrance of ambrosia protects effectively against disagreeable stench, as experienced by Menelaus when he plotted an ambush against Proteus 2 hiding himself under the skins of seals, whose stench was destroyed by the sweet fragrance of the ambrosia that Eidothea 1 placed beneath his nose(Apd.3.13.6; Apd.Ep.2.1; Hes.The.640, 790ff.; Hom.Apo.3.123; Hom.Il.5.369, 5.777, 19.37; Hom.Od.4.445; Nonn.6.25ff., 27.245, 31.254; Pin.Oly.1.60ff.; Try.185ff.).
The following is a collection of excerpts from Clock Shavings, my new book, now available. The topics are the Crucifixion and the mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau. Full analysis and more details are available in the book.
After that last séance, I remember reflecting on it for days. I was fascinated by how the different entities expressed themselves on the board. In particular, I was amazed at how Baphomet and Cain did seem to be inverted mirror opposites of one another, yet somehow connected together, just as Cain had said they were.
I noticed that Baphomet chose to move from one side of the wheel to another, so that when spelling out words, he would always, in-between letters, jerk it to the other side quickly. He would do this even if he didn’t need to use one of the letters there, and even if the letter he needed next was right beside the one he had just used.
Cain, on the other hand, preferred to move in circles. Even if two letters that he was using to spell something were right next to each other on the wheel, he would circle around to the other side to get the next letter. I thought maybe this had to do with the fact that Cain, the Black Sun, was a solar entity, while Baphomet was lunar (according to Eliphas Levi, at least) and an embodiment of opposing polarities.
I also discovered that the inverted alphabet sequence which all of the entities we spoke with were emphasizing, was in fact something known as the “Atbash cipher.” The writers of Holy Blood, Holy Grail had mentioned that the Atbash cipher was used by the Knights Templar! Incredibly, if you apply the same rearrangement to the Hebrew alphabet, then when you take the word “Sophia” (the name for the divine wisdom of God) using the Aramaic spelling (the Hebrew-Greek mix language used at the time of Christ) and run it through the cipher, you get “Baphomet.” This is especially interesting because another theory about Baphomet’s name, put forward by nineteenth-century Viennese Orientalist Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall, is that it comes from “Bapho Metis,” Greek words for “Baptism of Wisdom.” He speculated that this might be the title of an Ophite Gnostic rite secretly observed by the Templars.
The possible connection between Baphomet’s name and a rite of baptism is potentially important as well. The first mention of baptism in the Bible is in Matthew 3:10-12, when John the Baptist immerses Jesus in the river Jordan. Of course, the patron saint of the Knights Templar was John (as he is for the Freemasons as well).
When the Templars were accused of heresy and blasphemy, one of the specific charges was of practicing Johannism. This was an underground cult that venerated John as the real Christ, viewing Jesus as a false prophet. It is still practiced today in Iraq, as part of a sect called the “Mandeans.”
The Baphomet idol that the Templars were accused of worshipping has been speculated by some writers to have actually been the skull of John. As you will of course recall, John was famously beheaded at the request of Salome, according to the Gospels. Certain historians actually think that the Knights may have discovered the real skull of John some time during their occupation of the Holy Land. In the Gnostic text The Apocryphon of St James, John’s head is referred to as the “Head of Prophecy.” The tortured Templars confessed to their inquisitors that the Baphomet head “prophesied” for them as well.
With ideas like these running through our heads, Brian and I decided to conjure up Baphomet again for a thorough interrogation on just who or what he was. We wanted to know what, if anything, he had to do with John the Baptist, severed heads, or wisdom. The conversation that followed was long, very revealing, and quite hair-raising at times. It will make your blood run cold.
Tracy: Why is Baphomet associated with a head?
Baphomet: JOHN
Tracy: John the Baptist?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why is John the Baptist important?
Baphomet: JESUS
Tracy: Did John think that he was the Messiah instead of Jesus?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Did Jesus and John hate each other?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why?
Baphomet: RABBINICAL LAW
Tracy: They had a disagreement over rabbinical law?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did the disagreement involve marriage?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did it have to do with Jesus marrying Mary Magdalene?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What was the problem?
Baphomet: LEVI
Tracy: Was Magdalene from the tribe of Levi?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: But the tribe of Levi is the priestly line, isn’t it?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: So what’s the problem with Jesus marrying into the tribe of Levi?
Baphomet: END OF ILM
Tracy: What does “ILM” mean?
Baphomet: RACE
Tracy: Marrying into the line of Levi meant the end of Jesus’ race?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What line was Jesus from?
Baphomet: DAVID
Tracy: Why can’t the line of David marry into the line of Levi?
Baphomet: WORLD LAW
Baphomet then visited the rose-cross symbol in the lower left-hand corner of the board.
Tracy: Why didn’t John want Jesus to marry into the line of Levi?
Baphomet: PROPHECY
Tracy: What was the prophecy?
Baphomet: CURSE
Tracy: What do you mean?
Baphomet: PROPHECY OF DANIEL 5:5
At this point, we had a brief intermission in the discussion so that we could take the King James Bible from the bookshelf to look up the reference that Baphomet was giving us. As it turned out, Daniel 5:5 is the famous line describing how Belshazzar, King of Babylon (and son of Nebuchadnezzar) witnessed a disembodied hand writing mysterious words on the wall: “In the same hour came forth fingers of a man’s hand, and wrote over against the candlestick upon the plaister of the wall of the king’s palace: and the king saw the part of the hand that wrote.”
The words written – “MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSIN” – are interpreted to prophecy the king’s imminent demise, and that of his kingdom as well. At the time, I didn’t get what this passage had to do with the story of Jesus and John that he was telling me. So I came up with an interpretation about how it might be metaphorically relevant, and asked Baphomet if I was right.
Tracy: Did John see writing on the wall similar to that in Daniel 5: 5 about his own demise?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Whose hand did the writing?
Baphomet: ME
Tracy: Is Levi the line that the king needs to marry into?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is it that John did not want Jesus to marry Mary Magdalene because it would be an announcement of his intention to be the King of Israel, and John knew that would cause both John and Jesus to be persecuted by Herod and Pilate?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did Jesus disbelieve that the threat was real?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: And he went ahead with the marriage anyway?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is that why the bloodline of Jesus was cursed?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Who cursed them?
Baphomet: ME
Tracy: What was the curse?
Baphomet: QUARREL
Tracy: Can the curse be broken?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: How?
Baphomet: NOT FOR YOU
Tracy: Did Jesus die on the cross?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Did someone else die in his place?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Was he a willing sacrifice?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Who was it?
Baphomet: JUDAS
Tracy: He was the sacrificial goat?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did anyone else know about it?
Baphomet: SARAH
Tracy: Who arranged for this to happen?
Baphomet: ME
Tracy: Were you alive at the time?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: How did you accomplish this?
Baphomet: TRICKS
Tracy: So the head of John the Baptist was the Baphomet relic that the Templars had?
Baphomet: YES. 58
Tracy: Head 58?
“Caput 58M” was a designation found written on one of the gold-plated heads that were discovered at Templar preceptories after their arrest by French police in 1307.
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What does 58 mean?
Baphomet: MM
Tracy: Does that stand for Mary Magdalene?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why would the head of John the Baptist have a reference to Mary Magdalene on it, if John didn’t want the marriage to take place?
Baphomet: HATE
Tracy: Did the Templars hate Mary Magdalene?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Was she a prostitute?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Did they call her a whore because her marriage to Jesus cursed their bloodline?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Was that the Church’s viewpoint as well?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is that why they cut her out of the Bible?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did you create the Templars as a hate cult against Mary Magdalene?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did the Priory of Sion know this?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Is this what caused the “Cutting of the Elm”?
Baphomet: YES
The “Cutting of the Elm” is the name given by the Priory of Sion’s literature for the division that allegedly occurred in 1188 between the Priory of Sion and the Knights Templar. The Priory claims that both orders were at one time part of the same group.
Tracy: Who has the head now?
Baphomet: SION
Tracy: Why do the Priory of Sion call their Grand Masters “John”?
Baphomet: SIX JS
Tracy: What are the six Js?
Baphomet: JACOB, JESUS, JOHN, JOSHUA, JEAN, JOB
Tracy: Is the head of John the Baptist the relic with which the curse is associated?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Do you need the head to break the curse?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is the head the Holy Grail?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Is this what the Templars found in Jerusalem?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: What did they find?
Baphomet: ARK
Tracy: Why did the Templars want to capture Jerusalem?
Baphomet: DESTINY
Tracy: Is the head the treasure of Rennes-le-Château?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is it the only thing you need to break the curse?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: What else?
Baphomet: 4 PARCHMENTS
Tracy: The parchments that Saunière found?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Are the ones that have been published correct?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Are the genealogies a part of it?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Are the parchments a ritual to break the curse?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Are the genealogies important because they name the people who have been affected by the curse?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Can you tell us the meaning of the parchments?
Baphomet: YES
At this point, we went line by line through the coded message found on the second of the four mysterious parchments found by Bérenger Saunière in his church in Rennes-le-Château. The message goes:
“SHEPHERDESS NO TEMPTATION THAT POUSSIN TENIERS HOLD THE KEY PAX 681 BY THE CROSS AND THIS HORSE OF GOD I DESTROY THIS DAEMON GUARDIAN AT MIDDAY BLUE APPLES.”
So we asked Baphomet about it:
Tracy: Is “shepherdess” a reference to the Poussin painting The Shepherds of Arcadia?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Do you need the painting to undo the curse as well?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Which David Teniers painting is the message referring to?
Baphomet: TEMPTATION OF CHRIST
There is no known painting by David Teniers called “The Temptation of Christ.” There is however, one called The Temptation of Saint Anthony.
Tracy: Was the temptation of Christ the temptation to marry Magdalene and seize the crown?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: By whom as he tempted?
Baphomet: YIAY
Tracy: Who’s that?
Baphomet: A FRIEND
Tracy: Is this what the film The Last Temptation of Christ is about?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Who was responsible for that film?
Baphomet: ME
Tracy: What does “PAX 681” mean?
Baphomet: QUARREL
Tracy: How does PAX 681 mean “quarrel”?
Baphomet: CODE
Tracy: Which code?
Baphomet: MINE
Tracy: What does “by the cross” mean?
Baphomet: JESUS
Tracy: What does “horse of God” mean?
Baphomet: JUDAS
Tracy: Does “I destroy the demon guardian” mean “destroy the curse”?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What does “at noon” mean?
Baphomet: AT NOON
Tracy: You mean the ritual has to be done at noon?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What does “blue apples” mean?
Baphomet: BLOOD SACRIFICE
Tracy: Does someone have to be sacrificed in the place of Jesus in the ritual?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is it a real-life game of Ageio, where you kill the king?
Baphomet: YES
Lid of the Pastos from the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn
Tracy: Is that what was going on with Jesus and John as well?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did they know it?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Do you hate Mary Magdalene because you did you not want her to marry Jesus?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why?
Baphomet: LEVITES ARE HERETICAL
Tracy: Why are they heretical?
Baphomet: NEMES
Tracy: What is “NEMES”?
Baphomet: CITY
Tracy: Where is the city of Nemes?
Baphomet: BABYLON
Tracy: Did Nemes have another name?
Baphomet: UR
Tracy: So what’s the significance of Nemes?
Baphomet: RIVAL BLOODLINE
Tracy: Rival to what?
Baphomet: DAVID
Tracy: Did Magdalene have the blood of Nemes in her?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did the Levites intermarry with the Nemes?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did they do that during the Babylonian captivity?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is that why the Levites are heretical?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is there another name for the Nemes?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What is it?
Baphomet: NEBUCHADNEZZAR
Tracy: What do you think of the Nemes?
Baphomet: SLAVES
Tracy: Are the Nemes and the line of David originally of the same stock?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: At what point did the two lines separate?
Baphomet: ABRAHAM
Tracy: Is this the story of Ishmael and Isaac?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Are the Nemes cursed?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Who cursed them?
Baphomet: BS
Tracy: The Black Sun?
Baphomet: YES. SEPTAGUINT (sic) ABRAHAM The Septuagint is a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, although I did not know this at the time. The Septuagint has a different chronology from other versions of the texts.
Tracy: Baphomet, do you appear as one of the characters in the Bible?
Baphomet: YES. MANY.
Tracy: Tell us what some of them are.
Baphomet: DANIEL 5:5
Tracy: You were the hand that wrote on the wall in The Book of Daniel?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What else?
Baphomet: WEDDING CANA
Tracy: You were at the wedding at Cana?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Which character were you?
Baphomet: 7
Tracy: You were seven characters at the same time?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Name some of your presences there.
At this point, Baphomet abruptly moved the planchette down to the Abyss at the bottom of the board (which I will from this point on refer to as “WATER” in the transcripts), then spelled out the word “WINE.”
Tracy: You’re saying that you’re the one who changed the water into wine?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What’s another character from the Gospels that was actually you?
Baphomet: JUDAS
Tracy: Why is Mary Magdalene associated with Venus?
Baphomet: FEMALE. WATER.
Tracy: Because she’s female and she’s associated with water?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Does Magdalene represent a lesser aspect of the female side of Baphomet?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Do you curse that part of yourself that Magdalene represents?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why?
Baphomet: NAÏVE
Tracy: She’s naive?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Does the Black Sun excuse naiveté?
This was a question that Brian wanted to ask.
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Does that bother you?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Does the Black Sun love you?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is the Black Sun naive?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is anyone who loves you naive?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Do you hate anyone who loves you?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why?
Baphomet: DUALITY
Tracy: Do you hate us?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Do you curse everything that the Black Sun blesses?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did the Black Sun tempt Jesus?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did you curse the Nemes?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: How many curses?
Baphomet: 7
Tracy: What are they?
Baphomet: FEAR
Tracy: Fear of what?
Baphomet: ME
Tracy: What else did you curse them with?
Baphomet: POVERTY, DISEASE, DROUGHT, GREED, TREACHERY, CONFUSION
Tracy: Did they receive any blessings?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: From who?
Baphomet: BS
Tracy: How many?
Baphomet: 6
Tracy: What were they?
Baphomet: CULTURE, WILL, VIGILANCE, FERTILITY, LOYALTY, MEMORY
Tracy: Why did the Black Sun bless them?
Baphomet: PITY
Tracy: How do you feel about John the Baptist?
Baphomet: HATE
Tracy: Why?
Baphomet: NEMES
Tracy: Was he of the blood of Nemes?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did you have a deal with John the Baptist?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What was the deal?
Baphomet: NO MARRIAGE
Tracy: You made a deal with him to stop the marriage?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: What would he get in exchange?
Baphomet: LIFE
Tracy: You would let him live if he stopped the marriage?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: But he didn’t so you had his head chopped off?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why did the Templars keep the head of John the Baptist?
Baphomet: HATE
Tracy: Did the Templars hate John the Baptist too?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did they forget that as time went on?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Why did the Priory of Sion want the head?
Baphomet: CURSE
Tracy: Did they want to break the curse?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Is it that whoever has the head is immune from the curse?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is that the reason for the Cutting of the Elm? The Priory and the Templars split up because of a fight over possession of the head?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Is that the reason why the Templars were disbanded by the Church?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Did some renegade Templars give the head back to the Priory?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Do the Templars exist anymore?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Did the hate cult of John the Baptist continue on in Freemasonry?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Are the Freemasons fighting against the Priory of Sion as a continuation of feud that the Templars had with them?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: Are they all part of the same organization now?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: The Elm is back together again?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Do they have any enemies anymore?
Baphomet: YES
Tracy: Who?
Baphomet: NEMES
Tracy: Where did the Baphomet head go?
Baphomet: KADISH
Tracy: Is it still there?
Baphomet: NO
Tracy: So where is it now?
Baphomet: ISTANBUL
Tracy: Where is the spirit of Baphomet?
In reply, he visited the little black star by the crescent moon in the upper right corner. Then he went down to the watery abyss at the bottom of the board, and, we presume, to the real Abyss below as well. Thus ended what was, up until that point, the most productive, amazing, and frightening session we had ever experienced on the Ouija board.
At the time, we had no idea what “KADISH” was. When we looked it up the next day, all that was found was “Kadesh,” a city in the ancient Levant and now in modern Syria. More recently, I have discovered that there is a village in Iran named “Kadish,” currently populated by fifteen people from four families. But since the Knights Templar controlled territories in Syria, I think this is a much more likely location for the Baphomet head to have landed.
The word “kadesh” or “kadosh” means “holy,” and this is the meaning behind name of the thirtieth degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, “Knight Kadosh.” Although the accusation appears unfounded, the 1918 version of the Catholic Encyclopedia stated that there was a version of the Knight Kadosh initiation ritual written by influential Mason Albert Pike, which allegedly included the trampling of something representing the papal tiara. This was imagined by the Encyclopedia’s authors to be an homage to the rite purportedly practiced by the Templars in which they were supposed to have desecrated a crucifix in such a manner.
Istanbul is an excellent candidate for the hiding place of the Baphomet skull, although I only learned more about this possibility years later. Of course, this city was once called “Constantinople,” and was the capitol of the Byzantine Empire. The Christians who lived there spoke Greek and followed the Eastern Church, which had schismed from Rome in 1054.
In 1204 (16 years after the “Cutting of the Elm”), a crusader army (including the Templars) was redirected by the Doge of Venice to attack Constantinople (instead of the Saracen enemy) in order to eliminate the Venetians’ chief international trade competition. The knights sacked the city, and even destroyed the Hagia Sophia, the ancient “Church of the Holy Wisdom.”
But they didn’t just sack it. In the style of the alleged blasphemous secret rites of the Templars, they performed a Satanic “Black Mass” of sorts there. Upon the very throne where the Bishop sat, they crowned and enthroned a woman who was both a witch and a prostitute, then had her perform a lewd song and dance routine.
In 2005 I published my book Solomon’s Treasure, which contained a couple of chapters about possible connections between the head, the Templars, and Hagia Sophia. One noteworthy fact is the purported link between “Sophia” and “Baphomet” via the Atbash cipher. More directly, Constantinople, and a place just outside of it called “Hebdomon,” were host to not one, but two claimed heads of John the Baptist, one of which came into the possession of the Knights of Saint John (an order that merged with the remnants of the Templars after they were disbanded).
These relics were considered to possess magical protective powers. They were said to have played an important role not only in the history of Constantinople, but of Byzantium as a whole. One of the heads was stolen by the Crusaders during the sack of the city, and is now on display in the Amiens Cathedral in France. Another is still on display in Topkapi Palace in Istanbul. The Hagia Sophia stands rebuilt, and now rededicated as a mosque, in Istanbul today.
The story that Baphomet told us about Jesus being substituted on the cross by Judas is actually the plotline of something called The Gospel of Barnabas, dismissed by most scholars as a medieval forgery and Muslim propaganda. We knew nothing about this text during the séance, but later discovered that many details of Baphomet’s tale, including using “tricks” to make people believe it was Jesus being crucified, are to be found Barnabas.
This is a much more elaborate version of something mentioned briefly in The Koran. There it merely says that Jesus allowed somebody to die in his place, and let people think it was him. So although we could tell that Baphomet was giving us a heretical version of the gospel story, and putting himself forth as one of the main characters, we didn’t realize at the time that he was giving us specifically Islamic-based heresies.
Regarding Baphomet’s claim that the marriage of Jesus and Mary Madgalene resulted in the “END OF ILM,” let us look at what that might mean. “Elohim” was a plural noun used to refer to God in the Bible. It was also the name the Canaanites gave for their pantheon of gods.
The Canaanites had a myth about 70 “sons of Elohim” who each bred with humans to found different nations of people. This seems to link up to Genesis chapter 6, where the same term, “sons of Elohim” (rendered in English as “sons of God”) bred with human females to produce the giants.
At any rate, it seems that one way or another, Jesus was considered a direct inheritor of the DNA of God. There are three ways to think about this: (1) immaculate conception (Christian view); (2) his possible descent from the Nephilim, or (3) his unpolluted descent from Adam through the line of David by both Joseph and Mary. Either way, maybe the marriage with the Magdalene would have somehow desecrated that lineage, in Baphomet’s view.
However, it would take years before I became aware of most of the hidden meaning in this particular séance, which came to be known between me and Brian as “the Gospel According to Baphomet.” In the meantime, I filed this transcript away with the others, only bringing it out occasionally to show certain friends, for entertainment purposes.
An experiment by University of Washington researchers is setting the stage for advances in mind reading technology. Using brain implants and sophisticated software, researchers can now predict what their subjects are seeing with startling speed and accuracy.
The ability to view a two-dimensional image on a page or computer screen, and then transform that image into something our minds can immediately recognize, is a neurological process that remains mysterious to scientists. To learn more about how our brains perform this task—and to see if computers can collect and predict what a person is seeing in real time—a research team led by University of Washington neuroscientist Rajesh Rao and neurosurgeon Jeff Ojermann demonstrated that it’s possible to decode human brain signals at nearly the speed of perception. The details of their work can be found in a new paper in PLOS Computational Biology.
The team sought the assistance of seven patients undergoing treatment for epilepsy. Medications weren’t helping alleviate their seizures, so these patients were given temporary brain implants, and electrodes were used to pinpoint the focal points of their seizures. The UW researchers saw this as an opportunity to perform their experiment. “They were going to get the electrodes no matter what,” noted Ojermann in a UW NewsBeat article. “We were just giving them additional tasks to do during their hospital stay while they are otherwise just waiting around.”
The patients were shown a random sequence of pictures—images of human faces, houses, and blank gray screens—on computer monitors in brief 400 millisecond intervals. Their specific task was to watch for an image of an upside-down house.
The face and house discrimination task. Credit: Kai J. Miller et al., 2016/PLOS Computational Biology
At the same time, the electrodes in their brain were connected to software that extracted two distinct brain signal properties, namely “event related potentials” (when massive batches of neurons simultaneously light up in response to an image) and “broadband spectral” changes (signals that linger after viewing an image).
As the images flickered on the screen, a computer sampled and digitized the incoming brain signals at a rate of 1,000 times per second. This resolution allowed the software to determine which combination of electrode locations and signals correlated best to what the patients were seeing. “We got different responses from different (electrode) locations; some were sensitive to faces and some were sensitive to houses,” Rao said.
After training the software, researchers exposed the patients to an entirely new set of pictures. Without previous exposure to these new images, the computer was able to predict with 96 percent accuracy when a test subject was seeing a house, a face, or a grey screen. And it did so at nearly the speed of perception.
This proficiency only occurred when the computer considered both event-related potentials and broadband changes, which as stated in the study, suggests “they capture different and complementary aspects of the subject’s perceptual state.”So when it comes to understanding how a person perceives a complex visual object, it’s important to consider the “global picture” of large neural networks.
While interesting, the results of the study are exceptionally limited. A true test of the system would be to see if it could learn a much larger set of images, including different categories. It’s not immediately obvious, for example, if the computer could discern if a patient was viewing the face of a human or a dog.
Once refined, however, this kind of brain decoding could be used to build communication mechanisms for “locked-in” patients who are paralyzed or have suffered a stroke. This technique could also assist with brain mapping, allowing neuroscientists to identify locations in the brain responsible for certain types of information in real time.
Zionist war criminal Avi Dichter, the former Israeli Minister of Internal Security, former head of Shin Bet (Shabak) from 2000-2005, and current member of the Knesset, issued an ominous speech to the Israeli National Security Research Center on May 26, 2010. Dichter told the audience:
“We have achieved in Iraq more than we expected and planned. Iraq has vanished as a military force and as a unified country. Our strategic option is to keep it divided. Our strategic goal is to not allow Iraq to take its regional and Arabic role back. Iraq must stay divided and isolated from its regional environment. Nobody can ignore what we have achieved in this field. Iraq can never be the same Iraq before 2003.
Not only has Tel Aviv repeatedly admitted that it has benefitted greatly from the destruction of Iraq, it has openly admitted to being the cause of its destruction, though Zionist-owned mainstream media and alternative news networks have both downplayed it.
was a holocaust of the Jews during World War One. For example, see the article by Martin Glynn, the former Mayor of New York, describing a holocaust of six million Jews published in 1919 at 
- this is the door to the 'gas chamber' at Auschwitz - Yes, that is a window, and it is unbarred. The door itself is a typical wooden office door, it is not sealed. A visitor recently asked a guide why the prisoners didn't break the window and escape, the guide replied that an armed guard was stationed outside the door. That is, they really expect people to believe that this was a 'gas chamber', and, amazingly, people do. The 'gas chamber' is actually a morgue room in a crematorium. 
of typhus, was used to delouse clothing. A building containing several fumigation rooms still exists at Auschwitz, complete with the special machinery used to generate, distribute, and exhaust the gas produced by Zyklon. These rooms at Auschwitz are never shown to visitors. The fumigation rooms became the 'homicidal gas chambers' of the holohoax. 
not been gassed, they were emaciated and had died of disease. Watch the first minute of the televised visit of Oprah Winfrey and Elie Wiesel to Auschwitz 
Alfred Hitchcock no less, with footage shot when they entered Belsen, it is the source of the photo. The movie was shelved for 50 years but can now be seen here 
the Auschwitz entrance stating that 4 million had died there. 
at Auschwitz than Jews. The old stone plaque stating that four million had died was replaced by the plaque shown to the left claiming that one and a half million had died. The new number was not documented; based on the documents the figure should be on the order of (some months are missing) one hundred thousand. 
infected foot. The Nazis gave him the option of waiting to be liberated by the Soviets, or evacuating to the west. Wiesel, with his father, chose to leave with the Nazis. This is related in his book Night describing his year at Auschwitz. When Wiesel was in Auschwitz the Nazis were supposedly killing 10,000 Jews per day in gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. There is not a single mention of gas chambers in the book, Wiesel writes that the Nazis killed the Jews by throwing them alive into burning pits, one for children, one for adults.
of Jews. He testified as follows: 
inadvertent picture of Wilder on the set at Buchenwald is shown to the left. The film, complete with props, claimed that the Nazis made soap from the fat of (Jewish only of course) prisoners, made lampshades from the skin of prisoners, and shrunk the heads of prisoners like in the Amazon. Even the holohoax establishment now admits these were all lies. 
education for K-3 students is shown to the left. You can find the laws regarding holohoax education in your state at 
