If you are walking - slow down.....if you are running, run faster.
Friday, September 18, 2015
China Is Building The Mother Of All "Reputation Systems" To Monitor Citizen Behavior
China Is Building The Mother Of All Reputation Systems To Monitor Citizen Behavior
China's proposal is like a credit score that could encompass your entire life, from work performance to Internet activity.
China's proposals for a "social credit system" don't seem that radical when you read the dry, official plan posted by the government last year. As befits circulars from a socialist regime, the language is aggrandizing but unspecific:
Accelerating the construction of a social credit system
is an important basis for comprehensively implementing the scientific
development view and building a harmonious Socialist society; it is an
important method to perfect the Socialist market economy system,
accelerating and innovating social governance, and it has an important
significance for strengthening the sincerity consciousness of the
members of society, forging a desirable credit environment, raising the
overall competitiveness of the country and stimulating the development
of society and the progress of civilization.
Within all that verbiage, however, is something very radical. China
is proposing to assess its citizens' behavior over a totality of
commercial and social activities, creating an uber-scoring system. When
completed, the model could encompass everything from a person's
chat-room comments to their performance at work, while the score could
be used to determine eligibility for jobs, mortgages, and social
services.
"They've been working on the credit system for the financial industry for a while now," says Rogier Creemers,
a China expert at Oxford University. "But, in recent years, the idea
started growing that if you're going to assess people's financial
status, you should equally be able to do that with other modes of
trustworthiness."
The document talks about the "construction of credibility"—the
ability to give and take away credits—across more than 30 areas of life,
from energy saving to advertising. "It's like Yelp reviews with the
nanny state watching over your shoulder, plus finance, plus all of these
other things," says Creemers, who translated the plan.
The system, overseen by the State Council, is made possible by two
factors. One, it's now possible to gather information about behavior as
never before. As we use the Internet and different devices, we're
leaving behind a huge footprint of data. Second, the Chinese government
sees no reason to safeguard its citizens' data rights if it thinks that
data can benefit them, says Creemers.
"In Europe and the U.S., there's a notion that the state should be
constrained, that it's not right to intervene in people's lives, unless
for justified reasons. In China, the state has no qualms about that. It
says 'data allows us to make society for better, so we're going to use
it,'" he says.
Looked at from a certain perspective, you can see the value of a
social credit system. It encourages people to act honestly in commercial
situations, to be neighborly, and to evolve to a point of suzhi,
or self-accomplishment. It makes sense to have a system of neutral
accounting if you're looking to discourage corruption and improve the
level of trust among people. In a sense, a social credit system is just a
glorified version of the up and down votes on Reddit, or the reputation
system on eBay. It's a way to deal with liars, cheats, and loudmouths.
The problem is such systems can quickly become coercive or
directive—a way for the government to introduce norms of behavior and
then punish people who don't follow along. The document discusses the
possibility of punishing bad behavior, for example, by restricting
access to social housing.
"On the one hand, this credit system is the institution of
commonsensical rules for market behavior. On the other hand, it's a
control tool," says Creemers. "The Party sets out a way of behaving,
then it makes that way of behavior rational. You take away the ability
for people to decide on what they think is good and you take away their
choice of living a different lifestyle."
For that reason, we may want aspects of social scoring in liberal
societies. But, unless we want to be China, we don't want the full
state-controlled version.
No comments:
Post a Comment