Evolution is the change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations, but rather can we say it is a "vibrational change" in the subject's aura. By changing a subject’s natural energy field we change their vibration, and subsequently change their psyche and perhaps even their genetics.
This following example may sound crude, but please pay attention to the argument being posed. Could Black slavery be considered a form of unintentional immigration, having created a positive outcome for the slave’s future offspring, rather than an exercise in forced servitude. Let’s compare the evolution of Black populations in Africa versus that of Black populations in Western civilization. Can we argue that Black men and women have risen to greater heights in Western culture rather than in the African culture. In other words, have they have evolved differently.
The example of oppression and genocide impacting the evolvement of the Black race raises an important question; if African slavery had failed to happen, would Africans be better off today, and did African slavery negatively impact the White Western culture five hundred years later. How has the White race evolved and adapted to the Black race. The important issue in all this is that humans do not view themselves as a "unique species" with varying traits, dogmas and appearances, but rather opposing forces. Those forces are typically driven by politics and religion and they too impact evolution.
I contend that humanity’s evolution is not a function of geography or other factors, but rather a function of how external stimuli change a person’s vibration. The karmic aura which shields the mind, body and soul alters the human psyche when it is attacked by malignant forces.
Israel is a malignant force attacking the hologram. It is a globalist sewer hydrating all that is evil inside Satan's matrix. Max Blumenthal explains the horrors, the lies and the venom of Israel. Learn why Israel enacted the "Hammurabi Option" and what really happened on October 7.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/o1HCYhwXWMjb/
 | Mirrored: For all the sensationalism surrounding the events of Oct. 7, when Hamas broke through the Gaza fence and seized territory in the Gaza Envelope as part of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, there is still much that we do not know. The official Israel… www.bitchute.com |
Project Looking Glass - All timelines will converge into one singularity, ultimately retarding free will, and rendering the future static. This means that no matter what we do the outcome will remain the same. In 2012, the military’s “Project Looking Glass” concluded that only one possible outcome will result with the convergence of all time lines (i.e all future possibilities). It will cause an “Awakening Process” or an “evolution of consciousness”. The massive dam of historical lies that have been engrained into the human psyche will be destroyed. The new reality will extinguish the reservoir of lies, dispense with the massive veil of fear, and a construct a new “unimaginable” reality. According to Project Looking Glass evil will be extinguished even if that possibility appears unrealistic today. Good is allowing evil to exhaust their reservoir of evil before the game ends, and it is ending soon. While I’m a believer in a non-static future and many possible outcomes, this possibility excites me. It simply means that God is tiring of our inability to understand and do nothing of the evil that has suppressed His creation. It really is time for you to wakeup and start realizing what is going on, and saying enough is enough.
I asked ChatGPT to compare
Moral Relativism and Platonism
The answer is shown below.
Platonism and moral relativism are two philosophical perspectives that address fundamental questions about reality, knowledge, and ethics. Let's explore their key differences and commonalities:
Platonism:
Epistemology and Metaphysics:
- Forms/Ideas: Platonism, founded by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, posits the existence of abstract, transcendent Forms or Ideas. These Forms are considered more real than the physical world and are the ultimate reality.Knowledge: Plato believed in a theory of knowledge known as "recollection," suggesting that humans have innate knowledge of these Forms and can recollect them through philosophical inquiry.
Ethics:
- Objective Morality: Platonism generally supports an objective view of morality, grounded in the Forms. The idea is that there are objective standards of morality based on the ultimate, unchanging nature of the Forms.
Commonalities:
- Both Plato and moral relativists acknowledge the existence of a diverse and changing world.Both recognize the importance of individual and societal perspectives in shaping beliefs and values.
Moral Relativism:
Epistemology and Metaphysics:
- Relativity of Truth: Moral relativism is a position that denies the existence of objective and universal moral truths. Instead, it asserts that moral judgments are relative to cultural, historical, or individual perspectives.
Ethics:
- Subjective Morality: Moral relativism holds that morality is subjective and varies from person to person or culture to culture. What is considered morally right or wrong is contingent upon individual or societal beliefs.
Differences:
- Platonism posits an objective reality and objective moral standards based on the Forms, while moral relativism rejects the existence of objective moral truths.While Platonism suggests that knowledge is innate and can be recollected, moral relativism emphasizes the diversity of moral perspectives and rejects the idea of universal moral knowledge.
Commonalities:
- Both perspectives recognize the fallibility of human understanding and the influence of cultural and individual factors on beliefs.Both acknowledge the existence of diversity in thought, values, and perspectives.
In summary, the key difference lies in their stance on the objectivity of reality and morality. Platonism supports an objective reality and morality grounded in transcendent Forms, while moral relativism denies the existence of objective moral truths, asserting that morality is subjective and varies across different contexts.
The jew and Moral Relativism
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/religious-hate-crimes-in-israel-where-are-our-chief-rabbis/
 | For Jewish religious leaders to walk a moral path, they must speak out to protect Israel's minorities and prevent Jewish radicals from turning violent blogs.timesofisrael.com |
 | Dr. Robert Malone made an appearance this week at an “Injuries Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines” hearing led by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), at which he revealed how Moderna’s own patent shows that its Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” vials contain billions of DNA fragments and other contaminants linked to birth defects and cancer. At the hearing, […] www.naturalnews.com |
No comments:
Post a Comment