Are you a Confused Luddite?
We don’t need anything that Canada has’: Trump says he’s ‘not looking to renew’ North American trade deal. Donald Trump is not being exactly honest, because we know Donald Trump wants all of Canada, and he's made that very clear on many occasions. Trump is not exactly interested in Canada's economy, he is interested in Canada's geography and borders. Trump wants to preserve American history and hegemony by building a North American fortress.
On the other hand, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has forcefully argued that the global order has suffered a "rupture, not a transition," signaling the end of the post-Cold War, rules-based international system. This is not necessarily so. What has ruptured is the Globalist Agenda, to which Carney is a high ranking hierophant. This order overtly began with 9/11 - forming the foundations of a technocratic kakistocracy, garnished with Marxist ideology.
On November 27, 2019, before anyone heard of Covid, I wrote a message detailing what was about to happen to the world. Covid was introduced in a vague manner in December 2019. Here is what I wrote and it all came true:
Carney is attempting to preserve the after-math of 9/11, not the post-Cold War era. There were never any rules, just shadow governments, dark agendas and a plan to harness and eliminate much of humanity. This plan was taking root, especially when one listens to the ravings of Yuval Harari, but Donald Trump got in the way. To assume Trump is a lone wolf would be wrong. Trump is a controlled asset but those who control Trump are pursuing a different avenue for humanity. The end may be the same, but the joyride is much more exciting.
Why are humans gullible and easy prey. Let's compare ourselves to Mother Nature (MN). Mother Nature has not sought the assistance of science yet it continues to thrive. Humans have even subjected MN to science in an attempt to harness MN, in order to control it, but have failed. MN has the ability to retune and recalibrate itself when faced with any threat. MN controls its own destiny. When did humans lose the desire of perseverance. MN never lost faith in its Creator, humans have.
"Limits to Growth" was published in 1972. The message of this book still holds today: The earth’s interlocking resources – the global system of nature in which we all live – probably cannot support present rates of economic and population growth much beyond the year 2100, if that long, even with advanced technology. In the summer of 1970, an international team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) began a study of the implications of continued worldwide growth. They examined the five basic factors that determine and, in their interactions, ultimately limit growth on this planet - population increase, agricultural production, nonrenewable resource depletion, industrial output, and pollution generation. The MIT team fed data on these five factors into a global computer model and then tested the behaviour of the model under several sets of assumptions to determine alternative patterns for humankind’s future. The Limits to Growth is the nontechnical report of their findings. The book contains a message of hope as well. The authors state that: “The challenge of overshoot from decision delay is real, but easily solvable if human society decided to act,” meaning that forward looking policy could prevent humanity from overshooting the aforementioned planetary limits.
Let compare Limits to Growth to the world of technology, specifically Moore's Law.
Technology hasn’t exactly overcome Moore's Law. Instead, the industry has adapted as the traditional pace of transistor scaling has slowed. What has humanity done to overcome "Limits to Growth". It appears to be genocidal culling.
In 1965, Gordon Moore observed that the number of transistors on integrated circuits tended to double roughly every two years. This prediction became known as Moore's Law. For decades, this led to smaller transistors, faster processors, lower cost per transistor and rapid improvements in computing performance
By the 2010s, however, transistor sizes approached atomic scales, making further shrinking increasingly difficult and expensive. Nonetheless technology continued advancing despite slowing Moore's Law. Let's look at the innovations:
Parallel Computing - Instead of relying solely on faster individual cores, chipmakers added more cores. This allows applications to divide work across many computing units.
Specialized Processors - Rather than using one general-purpose processor for everything, companies developed chips optimized for specific tasks. Specialized hardware often delivers much larger performance gains than transistor scaling alone.
Better Software - Software improvements have become increasingly important, more efficient algorithms, better compilers, improved operating systems, and distributed computing frameworks. Sometimes software optimization can produce larger gains than hardware upgrades.
3D Chip Packaging - Instead of only shrinking transistors in two dimensions, manufacturers began stacking components vertically. This increases density and performance without requiring dramatic transistor shrinking.
New Semiconductor Manufacturing Techniques - Companies continue pushing physics forward with innovations such as FinFET transistors, Gate-all-around transistors and Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. These technologies extend the life of traditional silicon scaling even as gains become smaller.
Cloud Computing - Organizations can access enormous computing power through distributed infrastructure rather than relying on a single machine. Major providers combine millions of processors across data centers, creating capabilities that exceed what transistor scaling alone could provide.
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Optimization - AI is now being used to design chips, optimize manufacturing, improve software performance and manage data center resources. This creates additional efficiency gains without depending entirely on Moore's Law.
Are we beyond Moore's Law?
Many experts believe the classic form of Moore's Law is no longer the primary driver of computing progress. Instead, performance growth now comes from a combination of advanced chip architectures, specialized hardware, software innovation, Cloud-scale systems and AI-driven optimization
Technology didn't really "beat" Moore's Law, it adapted by finding new ways to improve computing after simple transistor shrinking became harder and more expensive. If technology can overcome Moore's Law, why can't human being overcome the Globalist Agenda for a New World Order?
The federal Liberal government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act (Bill C-34), which requires social media platforms and AI chatbot providers to prevent users under 16 from accessing their services. However, companies can obtain an exemption if they prove they have "sufficient safeguards" to protect children. What's really behind this bill, and is it really about our children's welfare?
The technocrats own the social media platforms and chatbots. They are in the midst of constructing huge data centres all over the world. Their hunger for maximizing compute is being drawn down by kids under the age of 16 using their social media services. In Canada, this demographic represents approximately 17% or 7 million users. These kids are unnecessarily overloading the system worldwide, limiting peak A.I. and its ability to achieve the Singularity. Technocracy only wants digital information on the "expendable class" - all those over 16. They are reserving the under 16 class as future human chattels.
Thank you,
Joseph Pede
Here's something interesting to watch. A man who does not realize God's simulation is a Hologram. Our interaction with the hologram stops when we stop interacting with it, yet we are the hologram.
No comments:
Post a Comment